Re: USB ports on Lenovo T400 do not work after a suspend/resume

2013-06-26 Thread Adrian Chadd
[snip] ok, I'll do a boot -v tonight when I get home and log things. Thanks! Adrian ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to

Нашел Ваш email адрес на веб-сайте

2013-06-26 Thread Александр
Добрый день Меня зовут Александр. Я занимаюсь профессионально электронными рассылками. Предлагаю прорекламировать Ваше предложение по любой необходимой базе данных. В случае заинтересованности - будет сформирована базу данных возможных потенциальных клиентов. Если возможно - пожалуйста

portupgrade(1) | portmaster(8) -- which is more effective for large upgrade?

2013-06-26 Thread Chris H
Greetings, I haven't upgraded my tree(s) for awhile. My last attempt to rebuild after an updating src ports, resulted in nearly installing the entire ports tree, which is why I've waited so long. Try as I might, I've had great difficulty finding something that will _only_ upgrade what I

Re: USB ports on Lenovo T400 do not work after a suspend/resume

2013-06-26 Thread Lars Engels
On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:09:20PM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: [snip] ok, I'll do a boot -v tonight when I get home and log things. Thanks! Please also try a recent CURRENT. I was having the same issues with dead USB ports on my X200, but IIRC it suddenly worked a few weeks ago. Unfotunately

Re: USB ports on Lenovo T400 do not work after a suspend/resume

2013-06-26 Thread Adrian Chadd
On 26 June 2013 12:51, Lars Engels lars.eng...@0x20.net wrote: On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 11:09:20PM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: [snip] ok, I'll do a boot -v tonight when I get home and log things. Thanks! Please also try a recent CURRENT. I was having the same issues with dead USB ports on my

Re: portupgrade(1) | portmaster(8) -- which is more effective for large upgrade?

2013-06-26 Thread Matthias Andree
Am 26.06.2013 18:42, schrieb Chris H: Greetings, I haven't upgraded my tree(s) for awhile. My last attempt to rebuild after an updating src ports, resulted in nearly installing the entire ports tree, which is why I've waited so long. Try as I might, I've had great difficulty finding

unsubscribe

2013-06-26 Thread Don O'Neil
Unsubscribe ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org

unsubscribe

2013-06-26 Thread Don O'Neil
Unsubscribe ___ freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-stable-unsubscr...@freebsd.org

Re: portupgrade(1) | portmaster(8) -- which is more effective for large upgrade?

2013-06-26 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 09:42:43AM -0700, Chris H wrote: Greetings, I haven't upgraded my tree(s) for awhile. My last attempt to rebuild after an updating src ports, resulted in nearly installing the entire ports tree, which is why I've waited so long. Try as I might, I've had great

Re: portupgrade(1) | portmaster(8) -- which is more effective for large upgrade?

2013-06-26 Thread Jeremy Chadwick
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 01:23:32PM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 09:42:43AM -0700, Chris H wrote: {snipping} Also, hoping the OP is subscribed to -stable -- you should probably deal with this. This is not the first time I've seen problems with mail delivery to a

Re: portupgrade(1) | portmaster(8) -- which is more effective for large upgrade?

2013-06-26 Thread Bob Willcox
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 01:23:32PM -0700, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 09:42:43AM -0700, Chris H wrote: Greetings, I haven't upgraded my tree(s) for awhile. My last attempt to rebuild after an updating src ports, resulted in nearly installing the entire ports tree,

Re: portupgrade(1) | portmaster(8) -- which is more effective for large upgrade?

2013-06-26 Thread Warren Block
On Wed, 26 Jun 2013, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: When rebuilding everything, I have always resorted to this: rsync -avH /usr/local/ /usr/local.old/ pkg_delete -a -f rm -fr /usr/local/* rm -fr /var/db/ports/* rm -fr /usr/ports/distfiles/* cd /usr/ports/whatever make install clean {lather rinse

Re: portupgrade(1) | portmaster(8) -- which is more effective for large upgrade?

2013-06-26 Thread Daniel O'Connor
On 27/06/2013, at 5:53, Jeremy Chadwick j...@koitsu.org wrote: cd /usr/ports/whatever make install clean {lather rinse repeat until done} The faster version of this is find /usr/ports -maxdepth 3 -name work -type d -print0 | xargs -0 rm -rf Simpler is to put.. WRKDIRPREFIX=/foo/bar in

re: portupgrade(1) | portmaster(8) -- which is more effective for large upgrade?

2013-06-26 Thread Chris H
Am 26.06.2013 18:42, schrieb Chris H: Greetings, I haven't upgraded my tree(s) for awhile. My last attempt to rebuild after an updating src ports, resulted in nearly installing the entire ports tree, which is why I've waited so long. Try as I might, I've had great difficulty finding

re: portupgrade(1) | portmaster(8) -- which is more effective for large upgrade?

2013-06-26 Thread Warren Block
On Wed, 26 Jun 2013, Chris H wrote: But it installed (pulled in) far more than those dependencies actually required. It may bring in build dependencies, but should be no different than manually installing ports. I believe, due to the fact that it doesn't appear to honor the original build

Re: portupgrade(1) | portmaster(8) -- which is more effective for large upgrade?

2013-06-26 Thread Scott Lambert
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 05:34:45PM -0700, Chris H wrote: Greetings, and thank you for your reply. I understand that portupgrade _will_ pull in other dependencies _as needed_ -- I _do_ read the man(1) pages. :) But it installed (pulled in) far more than those dependencies actually required.

re: portupgrade(1) | portmaster(8) -- which is more effective for large upgrade?

2013-06-26 Thread Chris H
On Wed, 26 Jun 2013, Chris H wrote: But it installed (pulled in) far more than those dependencies actually required. It may bring in build dependencies, but should be no different than manually installing ports. I believe, due to the fact that it doesn't appear to honor the original

Re: portupgrade(1) | portmaster(8) -- which is more effective for large upgrade?

2013-06-26 Thread chrish
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 05:34:45PM -0700, Chris H wrote: Greetings, and thank you for your reply. I understand that portupgrade _will_ pull in other dependencies _as needed_ -- I _do_ read the man(1) pages. :) But it installed (pulled in) far more than those dependencies actually required.

re: portupgrade(1) | portmaster(8) -- which is more effective for large upgrade?

2013-06-26 Thread Warren Block
On Wed, 26 Jun 2013, Chris H wrote: On Wed, 26 Jun 2013, Chris H wrote: Okay, look up the last time you installed or upgraded a port: % ls -ltr /var/db/pkg The last one is the most recently modified. Update your ports tree, follow all the steps that apply to your system since that date.

Re: portupgrade(1) | portmaster(8) -- which is more effective for large upgrade?

2013-06-26 Thread Garrett Wollman
In article 5e20544e3580a75759c3858f31894dc9.authentica...@ultimatedns.net, bsd-li...@lcommand.com writes: I haven't upgraded my tree(s) for awhile. My last attempt to rebuild after an updating src ports, resulted in nearly installing the entire ports tree, which is why I've waited so long. Try