On 06/04/12 01:29, Engineering wrote:
if (id != 0)
copyin(ugd->ugd_data,&id, 1);
error = uhid_set_report(sc, ugd->ugd_report_type, id,
NULL, ugd->ugd_data, imin(ugd->ugd_maxlen, size));
Hans is right. That code should do t
>> if (id != 0)
>>copyin(ugd->ugd_data,&id, 1);
>> error = uhid_set_report(sc, ugd->ugd_report_type, id,
>> NULL, ugd->ugd_data, imin(ugd->ugd_maxlen, size));
>
>Hans is right. That code should do the trick. Last year I've fixed
Hi.
On 06/01/12 20:10, Engineering wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Hans Petter Selasky [mailto:hsela...@c2i.net]
I think mav @ did some work in that area?
Are you sure you cannot use:
...
if (id != 0)
copyin(ugd->ugd_data,&id, 1);
error
-Original Message-
>From: Hans Petter Selasky [mailto:hsela...@c2i.net]
>
>I think mav @ did some work in that area?
>
>Are you sure you cannot use:
>...
> if (id != 0)
> copyin(ugd->ugd_data, &id, 1);
>error = uhid_set_report(sc, ugd->ugd_rep
On Friday 01 June 2012 18:12:20 Engineering wrote:
> From: Hans Petter Selasky [mailto:hsela...@c2i.net]
>
> >> uhid is not going to get obsoleted, though using libraries from
>
> user-space is sometimes more convenient.
>
> Thanks HPS (and Xiaofan)
>
> I definitely agree with that, but I've go
From: Hans Petter Selasky [mailto:hsela...@c2i.net]
>> uhid is not going to get obsoleted, though using libraries from
user-space is sometimes more convenient.
Thanks HPS (and Xiaofan)
I definitely agree with that, but I've got legacy code...
Last question - I've updated my code to convert the
On Friday 01 June 2012 15:45:40 Engineering wrote:
> [original post moved to end for brevity - or should I just delete it when
> replying?]
>
> Or is uhid being obsoleted?
>
uhid is not going to get obsoleted, though using libraries from user-space is
sometimes more convenient.
--HPS
_
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 9:45 PM, Engineering wrote:
> I had been researching libusb for a while, but their webpage says it is not
> recommended for HID devices and to use HIDAPI, which does not seem to be on
> BSD.
HIDAPI does work under FreeBSD using libusb (1.0 API) as the
backend.
https://gith
[original post moved to end for brevity - or should I just delete it when
replying?]
From: Hans Petter Selasky [mailto:hsela...@c2i.net]
>See:
>man usbhid
>
>Else use LibUSB to access the device.
>
>--HPS
Thank you for replying
I should point out that the usbhid.cpp compile below is my file -
On Thursday 31 May 2012 18:30:56 Engineering wrote:
> Hi all, I hope this is the right place to ask this
>
> I am in process of migrating an embedded system from BSD 7.0 to 9.0, as we
> need upgraded video card drivers which will not compile on the old system.
> To confuse matters a bit, I believe
Hi all, I hope this is the right place to ask this
I am in process of migrating an embedded system from BSD 7.0 to 9.0, as we
need upgraded video card drivers which will not compile on the old system.
To confuse matters a bit, I believe it was 7.0 with some of HPS updated USB
stack worked in.
The
11 matches
Mail list logo
