On Saturday 06 November 2010 17:48:41 Michael Martin wrote:
> On 11/06/2010 10:26, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> > On Saturday 06 November 2010 17:00:46 Michael Martin wrote:
> >> On 11/06/2010 03:31, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> Can you revert the last patch I sent an apply the
On 11/06/2010 10:26, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
On Saturday 06 November 2010 17:00:46 Michael Martin wrote:
On 11/06/2010 03:31, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
Hi,
Can you revert the last patch I sent an apply the attached one?
Then repeat the testing like last time.
--HPS
Here are the results:
On Saturday 06 November 2010 17:00:46 Michael Martin wrote:
> On 11/06/2010 03:31, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Can you revert the last patch I sent an apply the attached one?
> >
> > Then repeat the testing like last time.
> >
> > --HPS
>
> Here are the results:
> http://appliedt
On 11/06/2010 03:31, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
Hi,
Can you revert the last patch I sent an apply the attached one?
Then repeat the testing like last time.
--HPS
Here are the results:
http://appliedtechnicalknowledge.com/freebsd/usb_30_hub_patch/
I used one drive/port for the testing. da0
Hi,
Can you revert the last patch I sent an apply the attached one?
Then repeat the testing like last time.
--HPS
>
> I captured several debug outputs here:
> http://appliedtechnicalknowledge.com/freebsd/usb3-patch-214808/ . Maybe
> something in these can help.
=== usb_hub.c
=
On 11/04/2010 13:37, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
On Saturday 23 October 2010 15:37:55 Michael Martin wrote:
On 10/23/2010 00:23, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
On Saturday 23 October 2010 02:07:59 Michael Martin wrote:
On 10/21/2010 01:29, Michael Martin wrote:
Thanks for the new USB 3.
On Saturday 23 October 2010 15:37:55 Michael Martin wrote:
> On 10/23/2010 00:23, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> > On Saturday 23 October 2010 02:07:59 Michael Martin wrote:
> >>On 10/21/2010 01:29, Michael Martin wrote:
> >>> Thanks for the new USB 3.0 effort!
> >>>
> >>> I'm testing it out
On 10/23/2010 23:12, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 10/23/10 7:33 AM, Michael Martin wrote:
On 10/23/2010 00:23, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
On Saturday 23 October 2010 02:07:59 Michael Martin wrote:
On 10/21/2010 01:29, Michael Martin wrote:
Thanks for the new USB 3.0 effort!
I'm testing
On Saturday 23 October 2010 15:37:55 Michael Martin wrote:
> On 10/23/2010 00:23, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
> > On Saturday 23 October 2010 02:07:59 Michael Martin wrote:
> >>On 10/21/2010 01:29, Michael Martin wrote:
> >>> Thanks for the new USB 3.0 effort!
> >>>
> >>> I'm testing it out
On 10/23/2010 00:23, Hans Petter Selasky wrote:
On Saturday 23 October 2010 02:07:59 Michael Martin wrote:
On 10/21/2010 01:29, Michael Martin wrote:
Thanks for the new USB 3.0 effort!
I'm testing it out on 9.0-CURRENT amd64. The controller seems to find
a 2.0 usb stick fine. However,
On Saturday 23 October 2010 02:07:59 Michael Martin wrote:
> On 10/21/2010 01:29, Michael Martin wrote:
> > Thanks for the new USB 3.0 effort!
> >
> > I'm testing it out on 9.0-CURRENT amd64. The controller seems to find
> > a 2.0 usb stick fine. However, when I plug in a Western Digital 3.0
On 10/21/2010 01:29, Michael Martin wrote:
Thanks for the new USB 3.0 effort!
I'm testing it out on 9.0-CURRENT amd64. The controller seems to find
a 2.0 usb stick fine. However, when I plug in a Western Digital 3.0
drive, the device fails to attach. The WD drive attaches fine when
plugg
On Thursday 21 October 2010 09:29:57 Michael Martin wrote:
> Thanks for the new USB 3.0 effort!
>
> I'm testing it out on 9.0-CURRENT amd64. The controller seems to find a
> 2.0 usb stick fine. However, when I plug in a Western Digital 3.0
> drive, the device fails to attach. The WD drive att
13 matches
Mail list logo