Hi,
On 03/01/16 18:43, dweimer wrote:
I am considering setting up a bhyve virtual machine to run pfSense. Not
too thrilled with the CPU heat on the PC Engines APU1D4 when under heavy
load, but don't want to rely entirely on a VM. As I like still having
internet if I would have to take my server
On 03/01/16 22:36, Julian Elischer wrote:
this makes one wonder if it would be possible to run the pfsense code in
a vnet Jail.
That would be really cool and handy. The pfsense kernel is
unfortunately just a bit modified. I haven't tried but I think
many things will fail.
On 1/03/2016 8:43 AM, dweimer wrote:
I am considering setting up a bhyve virtual machine to run pfSense.
Not too thrilled with the CPU heat on the PC Engines APU1D4 when
under heavy load, but don't want to rely entirely on a VM. As I like
still having internet if I would have to take my server
I am considering setting up a bhyve virtual machine to run pfSense. Not
too thrilled with the CPU heat on the PC Engines APU1D4 when under heavy
load, but don't want to rely entirely on a VM. As I like still having
internet if I would have to take my server offline for disk replacement
or
iateaca added a comment.
In https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5473#117352, @mav wrote:
> In https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5473#117346, @iateaca wrote:
>
> > The motivation is to run older versions of operating systems such as
FreeBSD 4 which does not have AHCI drivers.
> > What do you
iateaca added a comment.
In https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5473#117324, @mav wrote:
> It was definitely significant amount of work, but I am not sure what
motivation was behind it. Why do we need it after already having much more
featured AHCI-based ATA/ATAPI emulation? Are there any
mav added a comment.
In https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5473#117346, @iateaca wrote:
> The motivation is to run older versions of operating systems such as
FreeBSD 4 which does not have AHCI drivers.
> What do you mean by code duplication ? I think only the ATAPI CDROM logic
could be
mav added a comment.
It was definitely significant amount of work, but I am not sure what
motivation was behind it. Why do we need it after already having much more
featured AHCI-based ATA/ATAPI emulation? Are there any significant OS not
supporting AHCI? There is significant amount of
