Re: available hypervisors in FreeBSD

2015-12-20 Thread Miroslav Lachman
Peter Ross wrote on 12/20/2015 09:15: Hi all, I read through an older threat I kept in my archive. It started like this: On Wed, 1 Apr 2015, Udo Rader wrote: As far as my homework digging revealed, FreeBSD supports four hypervisors: * bhyve * KVM * QEMU * VirtualBox .. and later Xen was

Re: available hypervisors in FreeBSD

2015-12-20 Thread Adam Vande More
On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 2:15 AM, Peter Ross wrote: > Hi all, > > I read through an older threat I kept in my archive. It started like this: > > On Wed, 1 Apr 2015, Udo Rader wrote: > > As far as my homework digging revealed, FreeBSD supports four hypervisors: >>

Re: available hypervisors in FreeBSD

2015-12-20 Thread Sergey Manucharian
Excerpts from Miroslav Lachman's message from Sun 20-Dec-15 09:57: > Peter Ross wrote on 12/20/2015 09:15: > >> As far as my homework digging revealed, FreeBSD supports four > >> hypervisors: > >> > >> * bhyve > >> * KVM > >> * QEMU > >> * VirtualBox > > > > .. and later Xen was mentioned. > >

Re: available hypervisors in FreeBSD

2015-12-20 Thread Adam Vande More
On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 9:25 AM, Sergey Manucharian wrote: > I agree that VirtualBox is really stable, and I'm using it in production > environments for many years. However, there are a couple of possible > drawbacks: It does not support VRDP (remote console) and USB2/3 on

Re: available hypervisors in FreeBSD

2015-12-20 Thread Udo Rader
On 12/20/2015 09:15 AM, Peter Ross wrote: > Hi all, > > I read through an older threat I kept in my archive. It started like this: > > On Wed, 1 Apr 2015, Udo Rader wrote: > >> As far as my homework digging revealed, FreeBSD supports four >> hypervisors: >> >> * bhyve >> * KVM >> * QEMU >> *

Re: available hypervisors in FreeBSD

2015-12-20 Thread Sergey Manucharian
Excerpts from Adam Vande More's message from Sun 20-Dec-15 09:36: > On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 9:25 AM, Sergey Manucharian wrote: > > > I agree that VirtualBox is really stable, and I'm using it in production > > environments for many years. However, there are a couple of possible

Re: available hypervisors in FreeBSD

2015-12-20 Thread Adam Vande More
On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 10:14 AM, Sergey Manucharian wrote: > > Remote console is available via VNC, not RDP. > > It is VNC, and I use it Linux hosts, it's rather confusing since the option > is "--vrde on|off". See

Re: available hypervisors in FreeBSD

2015-04-01 Thread Udo Rader
On 04/01/2015 12:41 PM, Roger Pau Monné wrote: El 01/04/15 a les 12.30, Udo Rader ha escrit: As far as my homework digging revealed, FreeBSD supports four hypervisors: * bhyve * KVM * QEMU * VirtualBox Make that 5: * Xen: http://wiki.xen.org/wiki/FreeBSD_Dom0 Altough FreeBSD doesn't

Re: available hypervisors in FreeBSD

2015-04-01 Thread Roger Pau Monné
El 01/04/15 a les 12.30, Udo Rader ha escrit: Hi all, first please excuse if this may be a FAQ, but even though I am a long time linux admin (~1996), I am quite new to the *BSD world and I am trying to evaluate if FreeBSD fits our virtualization needs. So, for my many questions: As far

Re: available hypervisors in FreeBSD

2015-04-01 Thread Roger Pau Monné
El 01/04/15 a les 14.59, Udo Rader ha escrit: On 04/01/2015 12:41 PM, Roger Pau Monné wrote: El 01/04/15 a les 12.30, Udo Rader ha escrit: As far as my homework digging revealed, FreeBSD supports four hypervisors: * bhyve * KVM * QEMU * VirtualBox Make that 5: * Xen:

Re: available hypervisors in FreeBSD

2015-04-01 Thread Roger Pau Monné
Hello, El 01/04/15 a les 16.27, Gerd Hafenbrack ha escrit: On 2015-04-01 16:19, Roger Pau Monné wrote: El 01/04/15 a les 14.59, Udo Rader ha escrit: ... thanks for pointing Xen out. I was indeed not aware of Xen running on FreeBSD, an intriguing (and well known) alternative. The wiki says,

Re: available hypervisors in FreeBSD

2015-04-01 Thread Gerd Hafenbrack
On 2015-04-01 16:46, Roger Pau Monné wrote: Hello, El 01/04/15 a les 16.27, Gerd Hafenbrack ha escrit: ... The documentation for FreeBSD as Dom0 seems outdated anyway to me. The document was last modified on the 15th of March 2015. I know things move fast in the IT industry, but I wouldn't

Re: available hypervisors in FreeBSD

2015-04-01 Thread Paul Vixie
Udo Rader wrote: ... I understand, that bhyve is native to BSD and will probably be the most effective. But given its relatively 'young age', is it production ready for (non nested) x86/amd64 linux guests? there's no libvirt for bhyve yet, which turns some people off. (not me, i don't use

Re: available hypervisors in FreeBSD

2015-04-01 Thread Gustau Pérez
Hi all, I found the source of the problem. Once upon a time I compiled my kernel with OFED support (WITH_OFED in /etc/src.conf). That installed $INCLUDE/rdma/rdma_cma.h, which at the time of the installation (haven't checked now) were missing the rdma_addrinfo structs. Moving

Re: available hypervisors in FreeBSD

2015-04-01 Thread Craig Rodrigues
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 9:41 AM, Paul Vixie p...@redbarn.org wrote: there's no libvirt for bhyve yet, which turns some people off. Wrong. See: https://libvirt.org/drvbhyve.html http://www.slideshare.net/CraigRodrigues1/libvirt-bhyve libvirt/bhyve is definitely not as polished as