On Wednesday, January 22, 2014 9:48:20 pm Neel Natu wrote:
Hi John,
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 2:15 PM, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
Is there any interest in supporting more legacy setups via bhyve? In
particular, I'd like to take a whack at improving the PCI INTx support
Is there any interest in supporting more legacy setups via bhyve? In
particular, I'd like to take a whack at improving the PCI INTx support, but
that can involve several things such as possibly implementing 8259A support
and a PCI interrupt router vs always assuming that we have APICs. If we
interest in supporting more legacy setups via bhyve? In
particular, I'd like to take a whack at improving the PCI INTx support, but
that can involve several things such as possibly implementing 8259A support
and a PCI interrupt router vs always assuming that we have APICs. If we do
want
Hi John,
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 2:15 PM, John Baldwin j...@freebsd.org wrote:
Is there any interest in supporting more legacy setups via bhyve? In
particular, I'd like to take a whack at improving the PCI INTx support, but
that can involve several things such as possibly implementing 8259A
On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 7:54 PM, Tycho Nightingale
tycho.nighting...@pluribusnetworks.com wrote:
Now with respect to bhyveload, while it certainly does have some
FreeBSD-specific uses, it is a bit of a barrier to supporting non-FreeBSD
guests and furthermore supporting them well e.g. reboot
