ZVOL backed bhyve VMs running on UFS or ZFS - Best practices, pros and cons, performance

Hi. I am planning to convert several 11.2 FreeBSD Jails into bhyve VMs. My bhyve setup uses a ZVOL for each VM (currently Debian and Ubuntu Linux using ext3/4) and I want to keep it that way for the new FreeBSD VMs. I really like the idea of having ZFS as file system inside the FreeBSD guests,

Re: Linux lockups inside bhyve VM on FreeBSD 11.1

Am 01.12.2017 um 03:41 schrieb Jason Tubnor: > > On 1 December 2017 at 08:29, Kai Gallasch <k...@free.de <mailto:k...@free.de>> > wrote: > > Hello. > > Last day an apache 2.4 running inside a Debian9 linux bhyve VM locked up > on one of my s

Linux lockups inside bhyve VM on FreeBSD 11.1

Hello. Last day an apache 2.4 running inside a Debian9 linux bhyve VM locked up on one of my servers (FreeBSD 11.1-RELENG, GENERIC kernel) overloading the VM. The VM uses a ZFS zvol blockdevice on top of a zpool, consisting of two mirrored SSDs. I was able to enter the VM through the bhyve

Re: MAC addresses to use for BHyve VM's running under FreeBSD?

Am 05.02.2014 um 08:03 schrieb Craig Rodrigues: Hi, I am running many BHyve VM's and am using tap interfaces with a single bridge. I am configuring the IP addresses of these VM's via DHCP. I need to have separate MAC addresses for each VM. Can anyone recommend a range of MAC addresses

Re: Virtualbox: time sync

Am 26.05.2013 um 07:03 schrieb Marc Fournier: First, thank you for the answer about switching from straight bridge to using a tap device … that made a *huge* difference … I'm not able to actually run a build world within the environment without having the whole machine lock up … Hi Marc.