Re: bhyve: svm (amd-v) update

2014-05-23 Thread Willem Jan Withagen
On 15-5-2014 17:56, Anish wrote: Hi Andriy, Thanks for your interest in SVM port of bhyve. I do have patch to sync it to http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revisionrevision=263780(3/26). If patches looks good to you, we can submit it. I have been testing it on Phenom box which lacks some of

Re: bhyve: svm (amd-v) update

2014-05-21 Thread Willem Jan Withagen
On 2014-05-21 6:59, Anish wrote: Hi Willem, Thanks for sharing your patch. I see that you have gone further than what I have. Are you able to boot Linux with these changes? I'm running ubuntu-{12.x,14.04} with this and I'm able to compile the linux kernel. Peter helped a lot in getting it

Re: bhyve: svm (amd-v) update

2014-05-21 Thread Nils Beyer
Hi Willem, Willem Jan Withagen wrote: I'd be interested in the vlapic to if that helps the speed. But you can help me a lot if you give me the SVN commands to do what you described above. These were my steps: 0) mv /usr/src /usr/src.bak 1) svnlite co

Re: bhyve: svm (amd-v) update

2014-05-21 Thread Willem Jan Withagen
On 2014-05-21 11:31, Nils Beyer wrote: Hi Willem, Willem Jan Withagen wrote: I'd be interested in the vlapic to if that helps the speed. But you can help me a lot if you give me the SVN commands to do what you described above. These were my steps: 0) mv /usr/src /usr/src.bak 1) svnlite co

Re: bhyve: svm (amd-v) update

2014-05-20 Thread Willem Jan Withagen
On 15-5-2014 17:56, Anish wrote: Hi Andriy, Thanks for your interest in SVM port of bhyve. I do have patch to sync it to http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revisionrevision=263780(3/26). If patches looks good to you, we can submit it. I have been testing it on Phenom box which lacks some of

Re: bhyve: svm (amd-v) update

2014-05-20 Thread Anish
Hi Willem, I patch against bhyve_SVM, because in the later case I get complaints that This patch is to sync bhyve_svm project branch with HEAD @263780, so you have to first merge HEAD to bhyve_svm. It will prompt you to resolve conflict in amdv.c, you should accept the changes that are in

Re: bhyve: svm (amd-v) update

2014-05-18 Thread Anish
Thanks for testing it. Your patch applied cleanly to the working copy of the bhyve_svm-project. I was then able to merge with HEAD (using theirs-full on one file) and compile the kernel. So, to me it looks OK to commit. Yes, that's correct. You have to retain changes in sys/amd64/vmm/amd/amdv.c

Re: bhyve: svm (amd-v) update

2014-05-16 Thread Nils Beyer
Hi Anish, Anish wrote: If patches looks good to you, we can submit it. I have been testing it on Phenom box which lacks some of newer SVM features. Your patch applied cleanly to the working copy of the bhyve_svm-project. I was then able to merge with HEAD (using theirs-full on one file) and

bhyve: svm (amd-v) update

2014-05-15 Thread Andriy Gapon
It seems that the bhyve_svm branch is a bit behind the latest interface changes in head. Is anyone working on sync-ing up the branch with the head? Some examples: - change of init method in vmm_ops - addition of resume, vlapic_init and vlapic_cleanup methods to vmm_ops - replacement of

Re: bhyve: svm (amd-v) update

2014-05-15 Thread Anish
Hi Andriy, Thanks for your interest in SVM port of bhyve. I do have patch to sync it to http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revisionrevision=263780(3/26). If patches looks good to you, we can submit it. I have been testing it on Phenom box which lacks some of newer SVM features. Thanks and