On 15-5-2014 17:56, Anish wrote:
Hi Andriy,
Thanks for your interest in SVM port of bhyve. I do have patch to sync it
to http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revisionrevision=263780(3/26). If
patches looks good to you, we can submit it. I have been testing it on
Phenom box which lacks some of
On 2014-05-21 6:59, Anish wrote:
Hi Willem,
Thanks for sharing your patch. I see that you have gone further than
what I have. Are you able to boot Linux with these changes?
I'm running ubuntu-{12.x,14.04} with this and I'm able to compile the
linux kernel. Peter helped a lot in getting it
Hi Willem,
Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
I'd be interested in the vlapic to if that helps the speed.
But you can help me a lot if you give me the SVN commands to do what you
described above.
These were my steps:
0) mv /usr/src /usr/src.bak
1) svnlite co
On 2014-05-21 11:31, Nils Beyer wrote:
Hi Willem,
Willem Jan Withagen wrote:
I'd be interested in the vlapic to if that helps the speed.
But you can help me a lot if you give me the SVN commands to do what you
described above.
These were my steps:
0) mv /usr/src /usr/src.bak
1) svnlite co
On 15-5-2014 17:56, Anish wrote:
Hi Andriy,
Thanks for your interest in SVM port of bhyve. I do have patch to sync it
to http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revisionrevision=263780(3/26). If
patches looks good to you, we can submit it. I have been testing it on
Phenom box which lacks some of
Hi Willem,
I patch against bhyve_SVM, because in the later case I get
complaints that
This patch is to sync bhyve_svm project branch with HEAD @263780, so you
have to first merge HEAD to bhyve_svm. It will prompt you to resolve
conflict in amdv.c, you should accept the changes that are in
Thanks for testing it.
Your patch applied cleanly to the working copy of the bhyve_svm-project.
I was then able to merge with HEAD
(using theirs-full on one file) and compile the kernel. So, to me it
looks OK to commit.
Yes, that's correct. You have to retain changes in sys/amd64/vmm/amd/amdv.c
Hi Anish,
Anish wrote:
If patches looks good to you, we can submit it. I have been testing it on
Phenom box which lacks some of newer SVM features.
Your patch applied cleanly to the working copy of the bhyve_svm-project. I
was then able to merge with HEAD
(using theirs-full on one file) and
It seems that the bhyve_svm branch is a bit behind the latest interface changes
in head. Is anyone working on sync-ing up the branch with the head?
Some examples:
- change of init method in vmm_ops
- addition of resume, vlapic_init and vlapic_cleanup methods to vmm_ops
- replacement of
Hi Andriy,
Thanks for your interest in SVM port of bhyve. I do have patch to sync it
to http://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revisionrevision=263780(3/26). If
patches looks good to you, we can submit it. I have been testing it on
Phenom box which lacks some of newer SVM features.
Thanks and
10 matches
Mail list logo