> > Will netgraph let you create a gif or other tunneling
> socket and plug
> > it in directly to the graph? Would the alternative be piping a
> > userland tunneling socket and ng_socket?
>
> there is an ng_gif node but I've never used it.
>
> look in /usr/src/sys/netgraph to see what exists.
Ahrenholz, Jeffrey M wrote:
Will netgraph let you create a gif or other tunneling
socket and plug
it in directly to the graph? Would the alternative be piping a
userland tunneling socket and ng_socket?
there is an ng_gif node but I've never used it.
look in /usr/src/sys/netgraph to see what e
remodeler wrote:
Julian Elischer wrote:
so does this mean it's all working for you?
Yes. Thank you.
Will netgraph let you create a gif or other tunneling socket and plug it in
directly to the graph? Would the alternative be piping a userland tunneling
socket and ng_socket?
there is an ng_g
Julian Elischer wrote:
> so does this mean it's all working for you?
Yes. Thank you.
Will netgraph let you create a gif or other tunneling socket and plug it in
directly to the graph? Would the alternative be piping a userland tunneling
socket and ng_socket?
_
Julian Elischer wrote:
> note the group permissions.
I rebuilt to 8_RELENG and permissions on /dev/kmem default to 540. Netstat
works in the virtual jail, and I did not have a route to a gateway on the
jail's subnet assigned to ngeth0. Adding a route to the gateway on the
physical ethernet interf
remodeler wrote:
On Tue, 06 Oct 2009 18:37:49 -0700, Julian Elischer wrote
please recap with a script that fails
Thank you for your response Julian. I very much respect the work everyone has
done on netgraph / vimage / jails, and also the help extended to me.
Kernel options in addition to am
On Tue, 06 Oct 2009 18:37:49 -0700, Julian Elischer wrote
> please recap with a script that fails
Thank you for your response Julian. I very much respect the work everyone has
done on netgraph / vimage / jails, and also the help extended to me.
Kernel options in addition to amd64 GENERIC are geo
remodeler wrote:
I am having the same problem as Nikos I am trying to implement a vnet-enabled
service jail on FreeBSD 8.0 HEAD. I have thoroughly studied the "Network stack
virtualization" document written by Marko. I received troubleshooting help
over several days last from Julian Elischer when
I am having the same problem as Nikos I am trying to implement a vnet-enabled
service jail on FreeBSD 8.0 HEAD. I have thoroughly studied the "Network stack
virtualization" document written by Marko. I received troubleshooting help
over several days last from Julian Elischer when I raised the issue
Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On Sun, 4 Oct 2009, Nikos Vassiliadis wrote:
Hi,
Hello Bjoern
I have outstanding patches that I haven't comitted yet to not
interfere with bugfixing of non-experimental things like the new
arp/nd6 code that will be shipped with 8.0-RELEASE while vnets are
still consider
On Sun, 4 Oct 2009, Nikos Vassiliadis wrote:
Hi,
It seems that some[1] routing requests fail when
done in a vnet environment:
r1# ifconfig epair0b 10.90/24
r1# traceroute 10.6
traceroute: findsaddr: write: No such process
r1# route -n get 10.6
route: writing to routing socket: No such process
Hi,
It seems that some[1] routing requests fail when
done in a vnet environment:
r1# ifconfig epair0b 10.90/24
r1# traceroute 10.6
traceroute: findsaddr: write: No such process
r1# route -n get 10.6
route: writing to routing socket: No such process
[1] every host routing entry, is manipulated
12 matches
Mail list logo
