hiya,
thanks! please do update and let me know.
-adrian
On 4 February 2017 at 11:06, clutton wrote:
> On Sat, 2017-02-04 at 10:57 -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>> ok, so far it indeed looks like a block-ack window issue. Which is
>> weird, because i thought I had fixed all the transmit block-ac
On Sat, 2017-02-04 at 10:57 -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> ok, so far it indeed looks like a block-ack window issue. Which is
> weird, because i thought I had fixed all the transmit block-ack
> window
> stuff a looong time ago :(
>
> Oh, can you please update to the very latest -HEAD? I only recentl
ok, so far it indeed looks like a block-ack window issue. Which is
weird, because i thought I had fixed all the transmit block-ack window
stuff a looong time ago :(
Oh, can you please update to the very latest -HEAD? I only recently
just fixed some multicast / queue handling issues which may fix y
all of em togethe.
(I'm going to go look at the element ids that aren't being processed,
in case it's something stupid I missed.)
On 4 February 2017 at 10:00, clutton wrote:
> On Sat, 2017-02-04 at 09:48 -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>> ugh, uhm, redo this on the client and AP side, and include "wl
On Sat, 2017-02-04 at 09:48 -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> ugh, uhm, redo this on the client and AP side, and include "wlandebug
> +crypto +11n" too.
>
> thx,
Just with +crypto+11n or
with input+scan+assoc+elemid+node+output+inact+roam+rate++crypto+11n
I'm doing with second now it's still working
ugh, uhm, redo this on the client and AP side, and include "wlandebug
+crypto +11n" too.
thx,
-adrian
On 4 February 2017 at 09:46, clutton wrote:
> AP: http://pasted.co/89e8eb3b
>
> The fall happened around this time: Sat 4 Feb 2017 19:32:04 EET
__
AP: http://pasted.co/89e8eb3b
The fall happened around this time: Sat 4 Feb 2017 19:32:04 EET
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Sat, 2017-02-04 at 09:17 -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> hi,
>
> can you do the AP side at the same time please?
>
>
> -a
Sure, give me 10 minutes.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
hi,
can you do the AP side at the same time please?
-a
On 4 February 2017 at 09:10, clutton wrote:
> http://pasted.co/3664ad20
>
> There it is.
> Nope, it's the log from the client which fails.
>
> On Sat, 2017-02-04 at 08:54 -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>> hiya,
>>
>> hm! attachments are strip
http://pasted.co/3664ad20
There it is.
Nope, it's the log from the client which fails.
On Sat, 2017-02-04 at 08:54 -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> hiya,
>
> hm! attachments are stripped. can you please put it up somewhere for
> download?
>
> Is that log from the AP side?
>
>
>
> -adrian
>
>
>
hiya,
hm! attachments are stripped. can you please put it up somewhere for download?
Is that log from the AP side?
-adrian
On 4 February 2017 at 06:34, clutton wrote:
> Hi list.
>
> The hosts are CURRENT both AP and client, after some time of usage
> client (my laptop) becomes deaf.
> tcpdu
Hi list.
The hosts are CURRENT both AP and client, after some time of usage
client (my laptop) becomes deaf.
tcpdump from AP shows that packets are received and transmitted back,
but on client tcpdump doesn't show receiving. arping doesn't work too.
ifconfig shows "status: associated" anyway.
I d
12 matches
Mail list logo