Hi,
Ok. I've reviewed this stuff in more depth.
Split-6 is still way too big to commit as one commit.
I was also hoping that we could get the updated hardware support into this
without necessarily adding the PAN support. But, you're the one driving
this, so it's up to you. :)
* There's
.. and I've just done the if_iwn_debug.h stuff, so you should update your
patchset to include that.
Thanks,
-adrian
On 23 October 2013 17:43, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hi,
Ok. I've reviewed this stuff in more depth.
Split-6 is still way too big to commit as one commit.
Objet : RE: [IWN] Review
On Mon, 2013-09-30 at 16:47 +0200, Cedric GROSS wrote:
Hello,
I forgot your lastest commit but it?s done now.
So split_6 and split_7 are sync with most recent ?HEAD.
Cedric
Cedric:
Hi Sean,
Which branch should we be testing?
As Adrian wish
-wireless@freebsd.org
Objet : Re: [IWN] Review
.. is this diff (split_6) against the most recent -HEAD? There looks like
there's some extra stuff in there that I committed recently (ie, the rate
control change and deref/free)
I'll go check it out in more depth soon.
Thanks,
-a
On 29
I guess '_u1' here is 'PAN VAP'. We'll eventually rename this stuff
and maybe shift it into a separate source file so all the PAN stuff
clearly lives elsewhere.
Ok I'll do that.
Here is new version of split 6 with new files and new function renamed.
Cedric
pan2.patch
Description:
De : adrian.ch...@gmail.com [mailto:adrian.ch...@gmail.com] De la part
de Adrian Chadd
Envoyé : dimanche 11 août 2013 19:09
À : Cedric GROSS
Cc : freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org
Objet : Re: [iwn]Review Split 6
On 11 August 2013 10:06, Cedric GROSS c...@cgross.info wrote:
U1 stand
On 12 August 2013 10:41, Cedric GROSS c...@cgross.info wrote:
But again, as current version is not stable in normal operation, I haven't
test it further.
What could be interest of this ?
Wifi relay, bridge or whatever usage of 2 wireless but only with 1 card.
It's likely for STA on one VAP
Ok, so this PAN support is .. pretty terrifying. We'll have to tidy it
up once the rest of this work is debugged.
I guess '_u1' here is 'PAN VAP'. We'll eventually rename this stuff
and maybe shift it into a separate source file so all the PAN stuff
clearly lives elsewhere.
I wonder which NICs
-Message d'origine-
De : adrian.ch...@gmail.com [mailto:adrian.ch...@gmail.com] De la part
de Adrian Chadd
Envoyé : lundi 12 août 2013 20:25
À : Cedric GROSS
Cc : freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org
Objet : Re: [iwn]Review Split 6
Ok, so this PAN support is .. pretty terrifying. We'll
Hi!
What's 'u1' as a prefix supposed to represent?
-adrian
On 11 August 2013 06:09, Cedric GROSS c...@cgross.info wrote:
Hello,
Here is patch split 6.
It's follow split 5 as it implement PAN context.
This patch is purely based on work done by Sean Bruno.
Cedric
-Message d'origine-
De : adrian.ch...@gmail.com [mailto:adrian.ch...@gmail.com] De la part
de Adrian Chadd
Envoyé : dimanche 11 août 2013 18:34
À : Cedric GROSS
Cc : freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org
Objet : Re: [iwn]Review Split 6
Hi!
What's 'u1' as a prefix supposed
On 11 August 2013 10:06, Cedric GROSS c...@cgross.info wrote:
U1 stand for unit 1.
As you see, all function with this prefix will be call when unit==1 within
iwn_vap_create.
As previously, I haven't investigate a lot this side. I plan to do so when
standard run will be ok.
Right. But
On 8 August 2013 03:43, Cedric GROSS c...@cgross.info wrote:
So please go and fix that!
Done.
Cool. I'll test this out on the 4965 and 5100 today/tomorrow and get
back to you.
-adrian
___
freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list
.. so what's this PAN context stuff?
-adrian
On 5 August 2013 10:23, Cedric GROSS c...@cgross.info wrote:
Hello,
Here is another split.
This one update if_iwnvar.h with new structure for later but also modify
iwn_softc for context selection.
Context will be used later when PAN
Committed!
Thanks!
-adrian
On 2 August 2013 04:12, Cedric GROSS c...@cgross.info wrote:
Hello,
After split 3 applied and committed , you will find split 4.
This one modify if_iwnreg.h
Add nearly everything we will need for later use.
Cedric
Hi!
Cool! ok, the style niggles.
* Your #define IWN_blah needs a TAB between #define and the IWN_blah
value. Right now you have spaces.
* $FreeBSD$ should be after the copyright header, not before
* Your new file is missing the standard single-include stuff.. ie
#ifndef __IF_IWN_DEVID_H__
On Mon, 29 Jul 2013, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Hi!
Cool! ok, the style niggles.
* Your #define IWN_blah needs a TAB between #define and the IWN_blah
value. Right now you have spaces.
There is whitespace at the end of some of the comment lines also.
textproc/igor will find problems like that:
De : Warren Block [mailto:wbl...@wonkity.com]
Envoyé : lundi 29 juillet 2013 20:11
À : Adrian Chadd
Cc : Cedric GROSS; freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org
On Mon, 29 Jul 2013, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Hi!
Cool! ok, the style niggles.
* Your #define IWN_blah needs a TAB between #define and
De : adrian.ch...@gmail.com [mailto:adrian.ch...@gmail.com] De la part
de Adrian Chadd
Envoyé : dimanche 21 juillet 2013 06:06
À : Cedric GROSS
Cc : freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org; freebsd-driv...@freebsd.org
Hi!
so, my feedback!
* Why'd you disable including opt_wlan.h ? It's required
De : Andrey Fesenko [mailto:f0and...@gmail.com]
Envoyé : samedi 20 juillet 2013 16:29
À : Cedric GROSS
Cc : freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org; freebsd-driv...@freebsd.org
On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 6:18 PM, Cedric GROSS c...@cgross.info wrote:
Hello dear all,
I'm please to announce that I
On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 7:30 PM, Cedric GROSS c...@cgross.info wrote:
De : Andrey Fesenko [mailto:f0and...@gmail.com]
Envoyé : samedi 20 juillet 2013 16:29
À : Cedric GROSS
Cc : freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org; freebsd-driv...@freebsd.org
On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 6:18 PM, Cedric GROSS
Hello, Andrey.
You wrote 20 июля 2013 г., 19:42:41:
AF I think whether to change AR9285 base card or not :)
Atheros is better. And, yes, Intel doesn't support host AP mode.
--
// Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov l...@freebsd.org
___
De : Andrey Fesenko [mailto:f0and...@gmail.com]
[...]
Great news, whether the driver supports n-mode?
What do you mean by 'n-mode' ? 802.11n mode ?
If so, answer is yes :
#dmesg |grep iwn0
iwn0: Intel Centrino Wireless-N 2230 mem 0xf7c0-0xf7c01fff irq
18 at device 0.0 on
Hi!
This is great news!
Are you able to merge this into the iwn driver? Is it feasible? I'd
rather not have two drivers in the tree for the same family of NICs.
Thanks!
-adrian
On 20 July 2013 08:54, Cedric GROSS c...@cgross.info wrote:
De : Andrey Fesenko [mailto:f0and...@gmail.com]
24 matches
Mail list logo