Note: to view an individual PR, use:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=(number).
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users.
These represent problem reports covering all versions including
experimental development code and obsolete releases.
S Tracker
I think it's a bug in the driver BWN (4), I tried all known variants and
the result is negative ... not connecting. Does anyone else have another
solution?
Thanks.
George
___
freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman
Hi
What difference in throuput can one expect between ht/20 and a ht/40 ?
Johann
___
freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-wireless-unsubscr...@free
On 22 October 2012 06:56, Johann Hugo wrote:
> Hi
>
> What difference in throuput can one expect between ht/20 and a ht/40 ?
If you're hitting best possible circumstances? Almost 2x.
Now, where's my IBSS HT bug? :) I can easily debug that stuff now.
adrian
> Johann
> ___
.. please file a bug. :-) Now that I have VIMAGE mostly working with
wifi, I'd like to take the opportunity to fix whatever 11n ibss bugs
you see.
There's no reason why aggregation and MCS rates shouldn't work with
IBSS. The only questionable issue right now is encryption and that
requires some st
El día Monday, October 22, 2012 a las 02:35:29PM +0300, George escribió:
> I think it's a bug in the driver BWN (4), I tried all known variants and
> the result is negative ... not connecting. Does anyone else have another
> solution?
>
I checked the mail archive for this thread and do not ful
Synopsis: [ath] 11n does not work in adhoc mode
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-wireless
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-When: Mon Oct 22 15:52:32 UTC 2012
Responsible-Changed-Why:
reclassify.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=172955
__
Yay, bug!
Adrian
On 22 October 2012 07:21, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> .. please file a bug. :-) Now that I have VIMAGE mostly working with
> wifi, I'd like to take the opportunity to fix whatever 11n ibss bugs
> you see.
>
> There's no reason why aggregation and MCS rates shouldn't work with
> IBS
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=172955
Johann
On Monday 22 October 2012 19:19:43 Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Yay, bug!
>
>
>
> Adrian
>
> On 22 October 2012 07:21, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> > .. please file a bug. :-) Now that I have VIMAGE mostly working with
> > wifi, I'd like to take the
Ok,
Please reply to the PR with some debugging output.
On both nodes, enable this:
wlandebug -i wlanX +assoc +ht +rate
Then do some pings on either side. Don't do iperf, it'll dump out way
too much debugging (one line per frame.) Just pings and record both
sides is enough.
It'll tell me how th
On Mon, Oct 22, 2012 at 4:09 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
>> What difference in throuput can one expect between ht/20 and a ht/40 ?
>
> If you're hitting best possible circumstances? Almost 2x.
I think I checked earlier: what about ht/40 on 2.4GHz? How do I enable
it and select the secondary channel?
2GHz is a bit flakier here because there's generally a lot more
interference floating around.
You just choose a primary channel and then say ht:40 . You don't get
to choose upper or lower here - the standard requires you don't have
overlapping 40MHz channels.
(eg ifconfig wlan0 channel 6:ht/40)
The following reply was made to PR kern/172955; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Johann Hugo
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Cc: Adrian Chadd ,
jh...@meraka.csir.co.za
Subject: misc/172955: [ath] 11n does not work in adhoc mode
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 21:19:21 +0200
--Boundary-00=_5wZhQXz13Lr4ES1
The following reply was made to PR kern/172955; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Adrian Chadd
To: Johann Hugo
Cc: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: misc/172955: [ath] 11n does not work in adhoc mode
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2012 12:57:42 -0700
Right, it looks like the adhoc nodes are advertising
So how about this, wpa_gui >>> Signal is null !!!
http://i.imgur.com/NKxaX.png
See here, you do not understand?
___
freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "f
Guys,
I think there's a bug in the bwn driver. But since there's no driver
maintainer at the moment, I don't know how/if it's going to get fixed.
The first thing that creeps to mind is "why are the RSSI values the
way they are." Is it just cosmetic, or is the unit actually seeing
really, really l
Lemme just be really clear - Bernhard and I would really, really love
someone to step up and be the maintainers for the Marvell and Broadcom
drivers.
If you're sufficiently motivated and can start merging in fixes from
netbsd/openbsd/linux, there's likely NDAs you can sign with
Marvell/Broadcom to
17 matches
Mail list logo
