Re: [IWN] Review
Hi,
Ok. I've reviewed this stuff in more depth.
Split-6 is still way too big to commit as one commit.
I was also hoping that we could get the updated hardware support into this
without necessarily adding the PAN support. But, you're the one driving
this, so it's up to you. :)
* There's DPRINTF() and the debug flags that you've moved into if_iwnreg.h,
which is the wrong place for it!
* .. same as iwn_intr_str()
* You still have style(9) issues:
+ the if constructs should be if (), not if();
+ you need spaces between things - eg, if (a == b) rather than if(a==b)
or if (a==b);
+ the } else { should be on one line, not separate on multiple lines.
* What's the story behind sc-ctx? When is it being set/changed?
* And then there's also ivp-ctx; that's the current VAP context, right? If
that's the case ,why are we bothering checking unit number? Why don't we
consistently check the vap context?
So, let's break up split_6 into this:
* create if_iwn_debug.h; put the debug macros, enum and such into that;
* submit a patch _just_ for the debug work, that's easy to do.
* Then, fix up the style(9) issues.
* Then, help me figure out what the story is with sc-ctx so I understand
what's going on there. I'd like to try and remove that if possible.
Thanks,
-adrian
On 28 September 2013 10:23, Cedric GROSS c...@cgross.info wrote:
Hello,
I'm get some free time. So I setted up my github for split work.
So on https://github.com/KreizIT/FreeBSD-IWN/
You will find 2 new branch : split_6 and split_7.
Split_6 is iwn -HEAD with split 6 applied. Patch for that is also available
in this branch.
Split_7 is iwn -HEAD with split 6 and new split 7 applied.
Split_7 start parameters task. So no massive change except that it's
manage NIC without BT.
Regards
Cedric
___
freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-wireless-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
___
freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-wireless-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [IWN] Review
.. and I've just done the if_iwn_debug.h stuff, so you should update your
patchset to include that.
Thanks,
-adrian
On 23 October 2013 17:43, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote:
Hi,
Ok. I've reviewed this stuff in more depth.
Split-6 is still way too big to commit as one commit.
I was also hoping that we could get the updated hardware support into this
without necessarily adding the PAN support. But, you're the one driving
this, so it's up to you. :)
* There's DPRINTF() and the debug flags that you've moved into
if_iwnreg.h, which is the wrong place for it!
* .. same as iwn_intr_str()
* You still have style(9) issues:
+ the if constructs should be if (), not if();
+ you need spaces between things - eg, if (a == b) rather than if(a==b)
or if (a==b);
+ the } else { should be on one line, not separate on multiple lines.
* What's the story behind sc-ctx? When is it being set/changed?
* And then there's also ivp-ctx; that's the current VAP context, right?
If that's the case ,why are we bothering checking unit number? Why don't we
consistently check the vap context?
So, let's break up split_6 into this:
* create if_iwn_debug.h; put the debug macros, enum and such into that;
* submit a patch _just_ for the debug work, that's easy to do.
* Then, fix up the style(9) issues.
* Then, help me figure out what the story is with sc-ctx so I understand
what's going on there. I'd like to try and remove that if possible.
Thanks,
-adrian
On 28 September 2013 10:23, Cedric GROSS c...@cgross.info wrote:
Hello,
I'm get some free time. So I setted up my github for split work.
So on https://github.com/KreizIT/FreeBSD-IWN/
You will find 2 new branch : split_6 and split_7.
Split_6 is iwn -HEAD with split 6 applied. Patch for that is also
available
in this branch.
Split_7 is iwn -HEAD with split 6 and new split 7 applied.
Split_7 start parameters task. So no massive change except that it's
manage NIC without BT.
Regards
Cedric
___
freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless
To unsubscribe, send any mail to
freebsd-wireless-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
___
freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless
To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-wireless-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [IWN] Review
Ok, so what, I should test out split_8, get that into the tree, then merge in more stuff from you? -adrian On 14 October 2013 08:17, Cedric GROSS c...@cgross.info wrote: De : Sean Bruno [mailto:sean_br...@yahoo.com] À : Cedric GROSS Cc : 'Adrian Chadd'; freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Objet : RE: [IWN] Review On Mon, 2013-09-30 at 16:47 +0200, Cedric GROSS wrote: Hello, I forgot your lastest commit but it?s done now. So split_6 and split_7 are sync with most recent ?HEAD. Cedric Cedric: Hi Sean, Which branch should we be testing? As Adrian wish to smoothly include changes into FreeBSD repo, split_6 an split_7 doesn't change big things regarding latest NIC. Instead Split_8, is minimal version for managing 2200 and so on NIC series. Could be a good idea to test this version with à lot of NIC. sean Thanks Cedric ___ freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-wireless-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
RE: [IWN] Review
Hello, I forgot your lastest commit but its done now. So split_6 and split_7 are sync with most recent HEAD. Cedric De : adrian.ch...@gmail.com [mailto:adrian.ch...@gmail.com] De la part de Adrian Chadd Envoyé : dimanche 29 septembre 2013 10:36 À : Cedric GROSS Cc : freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Objet : Re: [IWN] Review .. is this diff (split_6) against the most recent -HEAD? There looks like there's some extra stuff in there that I committed recently (ie, the rate control change and deref/free) I'll go check it out in more depth soon. Thanks, -a On 29 September 2013 01:34, Adrian Chadd adr...@freebsd.org wrote: Cool, I'll review it now! -a On 28 September 2013 10:23, Cedric GROSS c...@cgross.info wrote: Hello, I'm get some free time. So I setted up my github for split work. So on https://github.com/KreizIT/FreeBSD-IWN/ You will find 2 new branch : split_6 and split_7. Split_6 is iwn -HEAD with split 6 applied. Patch for that is also available in this branch. Split_7 is iwn -HEAD with split 6 and new split 7 applied. Split_7 start parameters task. So no massive change except that it's manage NIC without BT. Regards Cedric ___ freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-wireless-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-wireless-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
RE: [iwn]Review Split 6
I guess '_u1' here is 'PAN VAP'. We'll eventually rename this stuff and maybe shift it into a separate source file so all the PAN stuff clearly lives elsewhere. Ok I'll do that. Here is new version of split 6 with new files and new function renamed. Cedric pan2.patch Description: Binary data ___ freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-wireless-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
RE: [iwn]Review Split 6
De : adrian.ch...@gmail.com [mailto:adrian.ch...@gmail.com] De la part de Adrian Chadd Envoyé : dimanche 11 août 2013 19:09 À : Cedric GROSS Cc : freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Objet : Re: [iwn]Review Split 6 On 11 August 2013 10:06, Cedric GROSS c...@cgross.info wrote: U1 stand for unit 1. As you see, all function with this prefix will be call when unit==1 within iwn_vap_create. As previously, I haven't investigate a lot this side. I plan to do so when standard run will be ok. Right. But what's going on, per se? Is it two separate NICs that show up as separate PCI devices? Or is this a hack so the firmware can present two virtual NICs via the firmware API? Not a separate PCI device but yes ability to create 2 wlan NIC : iwn0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST metric 0 mtu 2290 ether 60:36:dd:93:34:56 nd6 options=29PERFORMNUD,IFDISABLED,AUTO_LINKLOCAL media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet autoselect mode 11ng status: associated wlan0: flags=8943UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,PROMISC,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST metric 0 mtu 1500 ether 60:36:dd:93:34:56 inet 192.168.1.20 netmask 0xff00 broadcast 192.168.1.255 nd6 options=29PERFORMNUD,IFDISABLED,AUTO_LINKLOCAL media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet MCS mode 11ng status: associated ssid WLenine channel 5 (2432 MHz 11g ht/20) bssid 00:24:d4:97:80:20 country US authmode WPA2/802.11i privacy ON deftxkey UNDEF AES-CCM 2:128-bit txpower 15 bmiss 10 scanvalid 450 bgscan bgscanintvl 300 bgscanidle 250 roam:rssi 7 roam:rate 64 protmode CTS ampdulimit 64k -amsdutx amsdurx shortgi wme roaming MANUAL bintval 96 wlan1: flags=8802BROADCAST,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST metric 0 mtu 1500 ether 60:36:dd:93:34:57 nd6 options=29PERFORMNUD,IFDISABLED,AUTO_LINKLOCAL media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet autoselect (autoselect) status: no carrier ssid channel 5 (2432 MHz 11g ht/20) country US authmode OPEN privacy OFF txpower 15 bmiss 10 scanvalid 60 bgscan bgscanintvl 300 bgscanidle 250 roam:rssi 7 roam:rate 64 protmode CTS ampdulimit 8k -amsdutx amsdurx shortgi wme bintval 0 ___ freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-wireless-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [iwn]Review Split 6
On 12 August 2013 10:41, Cedric GROSS c...@cgross.info wrote: But again, as current version is not stable in normal operation, I haven't test it further. What could be interest of this ? Wifi relay, bridge or whatever usage of 2 wireless but only with 1 card. It's likely for STA on one VAP and P2P-GO on the other VAP. -adrian ___ freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-wireless-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [iwn]Review Split 6
Ok, so this PAN support is .. pretty terrifying. We'll have to tidy it up once the rest of this work is debugged. I guess '_u1' here is 'PAN VAP'. We'll eventually rename this stuff and maybe shift it into a separate source file so all the PAN stuff clearly lives elsewhere. I wonder which NICs support PAN - ie, how I would even begin going about testing it out. Unfortunately our net80211 stack doesn't yet have P2P support - it would be nice if someone wrote up the basic infrastructure for that. Anyway. I'll test this out on the iwn(4) NICs I now have and I'll get back to you with any regressions that my light testing finds. As always, thanks! -adrian ___ freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-wireless-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
RE: [iwn]Review Split 6
-Message d'origine- De : adrian.ch...@gmail.com [mailto:adrian.ch...@gmail.com] De la part de Adrian Chadd Envoyé : lundi 12 août 2013 20:25 À : Cedric GROSS Cc : freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Objet : Re: [iwn]Review Split 6 Ok, so this PAN support is .. pretty terrifying. We'll have to tidy it up once the rest of this work is debugged. I guess '_u1' here is 'PAN VAP'. We'll eventually rename this stuff and maybe shift it into a separate source file so all the PAN stuff clearly lives elsewhere. Ok I'll do that. I wonder which NICs support PAN - ie, how I would even begin going about testing it out. Unfortunately our net80211 stack doesn't yet have P2P support - it would be nice if someone wrote up the basic infrastructure for that. PAN support is found within firmware: IWN_FW_TLV_PAN Anyway. I'll test this out on the iwn(4) NICs I now have and I'll get back to you with any regressions that my light testing finds. As always, thanks! Should be none I guess ;) -adrian ___ freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-wireless-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [iwn]Review Split 6
Hi! What's 'u1' as a prefix supposed to represent? -adrian On 11 August 2013 06:09, Cedric GROSS c...@cgross.info wrote: Hello, Here is patch split 6. It's follow split 5 as it implement PAN context. This patch is purely based on work done by Sean Bruno. Cedric ___ freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-wireless-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-wireless-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
RE: [iwn]Review Split 6
-Message d'origine- De : adrian.ch...@gmail.com [mailto:adrian.ch...@gmail.com] De la part de Adrian Chadd Envoyé : dimanche 11 août 2013 18:34 À : Cedric GROSS Cc : freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Objet : Re: [iwn]Review Split 6 Hi! What's 'u1' as a prefix supposed to represent? U1 stand for unit 1. As you see, all function with this prefix will be call when unit==1 within iwn_vap_create. As previously, I haven't investigate a lot this side. I plan to do so when standard run will be ok. -adrian It's follow split 5 as it implement PAN context. This patch is purely based on work done by Sean Bruno. Cedric ___ freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-wireless-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [iwn]Review Split 6
On 11 August 2013 10:06, Cedric GROSS c...@cgross.info wrote: U1 stand for unit 1. As you see, all function with this prefix will be call when unit==1 within iwn_vap_create. As previously, I haven't investigate a lot this side. I plan to do so when standard run will be ok. Right. But what's going on, per se? Is it two separate NICs that show up as separate PCI devices? Or is this a hack so the firmware can present two virtual NICs via the firmware API? -adrian ___ freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-wireless-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [iwn] Review split 5
On 8 August 2013 03:43, Cedric GROSS c...@cgross.info wrote: So please go and fix that! Done. Cool. I'll test this out on the 4965 and 5100 today/tomorrow and get back to you. -adrian ___ freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-wireless-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [iwn] Review split 5
.. so what's this PAN context stuff? -adrian On 5 August 2013 10:23, Cedric GROSS c...@cgross.info wrote: Hello, Here is another split. This one update if_iwnvar.h with new structure for later but also modify iwn_softc for context selection. Context will be used later when PAN context will be set in next diff. uCode TLV detection has been updated also. Cedric ___ freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-wireless-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-wireless-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
[iwn] Review split 4
Hello, After split 3 applied and committed , you will find split 4. This one modify if_iwnreg.h Add nearly everything we will need for later use. Cedric define.patch Description: Binary data ___ freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-wireless-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [iwn] Review split 4
Committed! Thanks! -adrian On 2 August 2013 04:12, Cedric GROSS c...@cgross.info wrote: Hello, After split 3 applied and committed , you will find split 4. This one modify if_iwnreg.h Add nearly everything we will need for later use. Cedric ___ freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-wireless-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-wireless-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
[iwn] Review split 3
Hello, As discuss we Adrian, previous big patch is too heavy for direct application in repo. So I resume splitting modification. Here is split 3. This one create if_iwn_devif.h for storing device ID and subdevice ID for later use. If_iwn.c and If_iwnreg.h modified as needed. Cedric deviceid.patch Description: Binary data ___ freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-wireless-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [iwn] Review split 3
Hi! Cool! ok, the style niggles. * Your #define IWN_blah needs a TAB between #define and the IWN_blah value. Right now you have spaces. * $FreeBSD$ should be after the copyright header, not before * Your new file is missing the standard single-include stuff.. ie #ifndef __IF_IWN_DEVID_H__ #define __IF_IWN_DEVID_H__ (header contents go here..) #endif /* __IF_IWN_DEVID_H__ */ -adrian On 29 July 2013 08:49, Cedric GROSS c...@cgross.info wrote: Hello, As discuss we Adrian, previous big patch is too heavy for direct application in repo. So I resume splitting modification. Here is split 3. This one create if_iwn_devif.h for storing device ID and subdevice ID for later use. If_iwn.c and If_iwnreg.h modified as needed. Cedric ___ freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-wireless-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-wireless-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: [iwn] Review split 3
On Mon, 29 Jul 2013, Adrian Chadd wrote: Hi! Cool! ok, the style niggles. * Your #define IWN_blah needs a TAB between #define and the IWN_blah value. Right now you have spaces. There is whitespace at the end of some of the comment lines also. textproc/igor will find problems like that: igor -R filename | less -RS ___ freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-wireless-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
RE: [iwn] Review split 3
De : Warren Block [mailto:wbl...@wonkity.com] Envoyé : lundi 29 juillet 2013 20:11 À : Adrian Chadd Cc : Cedric GROSS; freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org On Mon, 29 Jul 2013, Adrian Chadd wrote: Hi! Cool! ok, the style niggles. * Your #define IWN_blah needs a TAB between #define and the IWN_blah value. Right now you have spaces. Ok, I tough you need spaces between #define and values... standard single-include stuff : Done $FreeBSD$ : Moved Each file is different. Really hard to find something common. Man 9 style is quite useful but enough precise for tab and space usage I think. There is whitespace at the end of some of the comment lines also. textproc/igor will find problems like that: igor -R filename | less -RS Thanks for that Warren ! deviceid.patch Description: Binary data ___ freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-wireless-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
IWN Review split 1
Hello there, As discuss this morning on Efnet, here is the first small patch for IWN. This one add an hint value for early debugging IWN. Early debug feature will start printing information from attach function and further. After attachment, debug verbosity is controlled by sysctl value. Cedric hint_debug.patch Description: Binary data ___ freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-wireless-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
RE: IWN Review
De : adrian.ch...@gmail.com [mailto:adrian.ch...@gmail.com] De la part de Adrian Chadd Envoyé : dimanche 21 juillet 2013 06:06 À : Cedric GROSS Cc : freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org; freebsd-driv...@freebsd.org Hi! so, my feedback! * Why'd you disable including opt_wlan.h ? It's required Just because I worked with a 9.1-release and I don't reach to compile iwn with this include. Forget to enable it again. * What merge issues did you have? I'd like to get this tree updated to the latest -HEAD, including whatever my recent changes for rate selection, so we can get this stuff tidied up for -HEAD Ok I will try. * Why was ieee80211_resume_all() commented out? Did you do this? This things was not in original IWL so I commented it to be sure that my version of IWN work as iwl do. Plan to uncomment when merging to HEAD. There's some stuff we can merge in right now into -HEAD: * the debug improvements * the changes from hard-coded checks for features based on the chipset, to a bitmap of features that get set during probe/attach So, let's try to get your stuff updated to the latest -HEAD, then get it tested out. I'll then start merging this stuff into -HEAD as we figure out what all these pieces do. Thanks for all this hard work! -adrian On 20 July 2013 07:18, Cedric GROSS c...@cgross.info wrote: Hello dear all, I'm please to announce that I completed my work on IWN. My version available here https://github.com/KreizIT/FreeBSD-IWN include improvement issued by seanbruno (https://github.com/seanbruno/freebsd-iwl) but also mine to support centrino N 2230 NIC (it's my NIC) I set up a new parameters system which more sensitive. I port back all NIC parameters to this new system. I hope that I haven't do some mistake. So I'll be really please if Intel's NIC owner could check my work and let me know. By the way, if commiters would include my work, please do. Cheers Cedric ___ freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-wireless- unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-wireless-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
IWN Review
Hello dear all, I'm please to announce that I completed my work on IWN. My version available here https://github.com/KreizIT/FreeBSD-IWN include improvement issued by seanbruno (https://github.com/seanbruno/freebsd-iwl) but also mine to support centrino N 2230 NIC (it's my NIC) I set up a new parameters system which more sensitive. I port back all NIC parameters to this new system. I hope that I haven't do some mistake. So I'll be really please if Intel's NIC owner could check my work and let me know. By the way, if commiters would include my work, please do. Cheers Cedric ___ freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-wireless-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
RE: IWN Review
De : Andrey Fesenko [mailto:f0and...@gmail.com] Envoyé : samedi 20 juillet 2013 16:29 À : Cedric GROSS Cc : freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org; freebsd-driv...@freebsd.org On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 6:18 PM, Cedric GROSS c...@cgross.info wrote: Hello dear all, I'm please to announce that I completed my work on IWN. My version available here https://github.com/KreizIT/FreeBSD-IWN include improvement issued by seanbruno (https://github.com/seanbruno/freebsd-iwl) but also mine to support centrino N 2230 NIC (it's my NIC) I set up a new parameters system which more sensitive. I port back all NIC parameters to this new system. I hope that I haven't do some mistake. So I'll be really please if Intel's NIC owner could check my work and let me know. By the way, if commiters would include my work, please do. Cheers Cedric Great news, whether the driver supports n-mode? What do you mean by 'n-mode' ? 802.11n mode ? If so, answer is yes : #dmesg |grep iwn0 iwn0: Intel Centrino Wireless-N 2230 mem 0xf7c0-0xf7c01fff irq 18 at device 0.0 on pci4 #ifconfig wlan0 wlan0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST metric 0 mtu 1500 nd6 options=29PERFORMNUD,IFDISABLED,AUTO_LINKLOCAL media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet DS/1Mbps mode 11ng status: associated ssid FreeWifi channel 5 (2432 MHz 11g ht/20) Cedric ___ freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-wireless-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: IWN Review
On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 7:30 PM, Cedric GROSS c...@cgross.info wrote: De : Andrey Fesenko [mailto:f0and...@gmail.com] Envoyé : samedi 20 juillet 2013 16:29 À : Cedric GROSS Cc : freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org; freebsd-driv...@freebsd.org On Sat, Jul 20, 2013 at 6:18 PM, Cedric GROSS c...@cgross.info wrote: Hello dear all, I'm please to announce that I completed my work on IWN. My version available here https://github.com/KreizIT/FreeBSD-IWN include improvement issued by seanbruno (https://github.com/seanbruno/freebsd-iwl) but also mine to support centrino N 2230 NIC (it's my NIC) I set up a new parameters system which more sensitive. I port back all NIC parameters to this new system. I hope that I haven't do some mistake. So I'll be really please if Intel's NIC owner could check my work and let me know. By the way, if commiters would include my work, please do. Cheers Cedric Great news, whether the driver supports n-mode? What do you mean by 'n-mode' ? 802.11n mode ? If so, answer is yes : #dmesg |grep iwn0 iwn0: Intel Centrino Wireless-N 2230 mem 0xf7c0-0xf7c01fff irq 18 at device 0.0 on pci4 #ifconfig wlan0 wlan0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST metric 0 mtu 1500 nd6 options=29PERFORMNUD,IFDISABLED,AUTO_LINKLOCAL media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet DS/1Mbps mode 11ng status: associated ssid FreeWifi channel 5 (2432 MHz 11g ht/20) Cedric Nice, ht/40 support to? Do you plan to support other cards Intel 6235 and supporting more than one range (5GHz)? I think whether to change AR9285 base card or not :) ___ freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-wireless-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: IWN Review
Hello, Andrey. You wrote 20 июля 2013 г., 19:42:41: AF I think whether to change AR9285 base card or not :) Atheros is better. And, yes, Intel doesn't support host AP mode. -- // Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov l...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-wireless-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
RE: IWN Review
De : Andrey Fesenko [mailto:f0and...@gmail.com] [...] Great news, whether the driver supports n-mode? What do you mean by 'n-mode' ? 802.11n mode ? If so, answer is yes : #dmesg |grep iwn0 iwn0: Intel Centrino Wireless-N 2230 mem 0xf7c0-0xf7c01fff irq 18 at device 0.0 on pci4 #ifconfig wlan0 wlan0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST metric 0 mtu 1500 nd6 options=29PERFORMNUD,IFDISABLED,AUTO_LINKLOCAL media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet DS/1Mbps mode 11ng status: associated ssid FreeWifi channel 5 (2432 MHz 11g ht/20) Cedric Nice, ht/40 support to? I don't know. I'm too noob in iwn to say that. I let someone else answer. Do you plan to support other cards Intel 6235 and supporting more than one range (5GHz)? 6235 is already supported by my version. I just wait for a friend to test it but it should be ok. For other range, as for ht/40, I'm not enough expert for doing that, sorry. I think whether to change AR9285 base card or not :) -- Cedric ___ freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-wireless-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
Re: IWN Review
Hi! This is great news! Are you able to merge this into the iwn driver? Is it feasible? I'd rather not have two drivers in the tree for the same family of NICs. Thanks! -adrian On 20 July 2013 08:54, Cedric GROSS c...@cgross.info wrote: De : Andrey Fesenko [mailto:f0and...@gmail.com] [...] Great news, whether the driver supports n-mode? What do you mean by 'n-mode' ? 802.11n mode ? If so, answer is yes : #dmesg |grep iwn0 iwn0: Intel Centrino Wireless-N 2230 mem 0xf7c0-0xf7c01fff irq 18 at device 0.0 on pci4 #ifconfig wlan0 wlan0: flags=8843UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST metric 0 mtu 1500 nd6 options=29PERFORMNUD,IFDISABLED,AUTO_LINKLOCAL media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet DS/1Mbps mode 11ng status: associated ssid FreeWifi channel 5 (2432 MHz 11g ht/20) Cedric Nice, ht/40 support to? I don't know. I'm too noob in iwn to say that. I let someone else answer. Do you plan to support other cards Intel 6235 and supporting more than one range (5GHz)? 6235 is already supported by my version. I just wait for a friend to test it but it should be ok. For other range, as for ht/40, I'm not enough expert for doing that, sorry. I think whether to change AR9285 base card or not :) -- Cedric ___ freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-wireless-unsubscr...@freebsd.org ___ freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless To unsubscribe, send any mail to freebsd-wireless-unsubscr...@freebsd.org
