RE: [iwn]Review Split 6

2013-08-13 Thread Cedric GROSS
> > > > I guess '_u1' here is 'PAN VAP'. We'll eventually rename this stuff > > and maybe shift it into a separate source file so all the PAN stuff > > clearly lives elsewhere. > > Ok I'll do that. > Here is new version of split 6 with new files and new function renamed. Cedric pan2.patch Des

Re: [iwn]Review Split 6

2013-08-12 Thread Adrian Chadd
I have a lot of the NICs now. I may even test with the 1000 series NICs. :p -adrian ___ freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-wireless To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-wireless-unsubscr...@f

RE: [iwn]Review Split 6

2013-08-12 Thread Cedric GROSS
> -Message d'origine- > De : adrian.ch...@gmail.com [mailto:adrian.ch...@gmail.com] De la part > de Adrian Chadd > Envoyé : lundi 12 août 2013 20:25 > À : Cedric GROSS > Cc : freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org > Objet : Re: [iwn]Review Split 6 > > Ok,

Re: [iwn]Review Split 6

2013-08-12 Thread Adrian Chadd
Ok, so this PAN support is .. pretty terrifying. We'll have to tidy it up once the rest of this work is debugged. I guess '_u1' here is 'PAN VAP'. We'll eventually rename this stuff and maybe shift it into a separate source file so all the PAN stuff clearly lives elsewhere. I wonder which NICs su

Re: [iwn]Review Split 6

2013-08-12 Thread Adrian Chadd
On 12 August 2013 10:41, Cedric GROSS wrote: > But again, as current version is not stable in normal operation, I haven't > test it further. > > What could be interest of this ? > Wifi relay, bridge or whatever usage of 2 wireless but only with 1 card. It's likely for STA on one VAP and P2P-GO o

RE: [iwn]Review Split 6

2013-08-12 Thread Cedric GROSS
> De : adrian.ch...@gmail.com [mailto:adrian.ch...@gmail.com] De la part > de Adrian Chadd > Envoyé : lundi 12 août 2013 19:31 > À : Cedric GROSS > Cc : freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org > Objet : Re: [iwn]Review Split 6 > > How do you create the second VAP, and what'

Re: [iwn]Review Split 6

2013-08-12 Thread Adrian Chadd
c GROSS >> Cc : freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org >> Objet : Re: [iwn]Review Split 6 >> >> On 11 August 2013 10:06, Cedric GROSS wrote: >> >> > U1 stand for unit 1. >> > As you see, all function with this prefix will be call when unit==1 >> > within iwn

RE: [iwn]Review Split 6

2013-08-12 Thread Cedric GROSS
> De : adrian.ch...@gmail.com [mailto:adrian.ch...@gmail.com] De la part > de Adrian Chadd > Envoyé : dimanche 11 août 2013 19:09 > À : Cedric GROSS > Cc : freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org > Objet : Re: [iwn]Review Split 6 > > On 11 August 2013 10:06, Cedric GROSS wrote: &g

Re: [iwn]Review Split 6

2013-08-11 Thread Adrian Chadd
On 11 August 2013 10:06, Cedric GROSS wrote: > U1 stand for unit 1. > As you see, all function with this prefix will be call when unit==1 within > iwn_vap_create. > > As previously, I haven't investigate a lot this side. I plan to do so when > standard run will be ok. Right. But what's going on,

RE: [iwn]Review Split 6

2013-08-11 Thread Cedric GROSS
> -Message d'origine- > De : adrian.ch...@gmail.com [mailto:adrian.ch...@gmail.com] De la part > de Adrian Chadd > Envoyé : dimanche 11 août 2013 18:34 > À : Cedric GROSS > Cc : freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org > Objet : Re: [iwn]Review Split 6 > > Hi! >

Re: [iwn]Review Split 6

2013-08-11 Thread Adrian Chadd
Hi! What's 'u1' as a prefix supposed to represent? -adrian On 11 August 2013 06:09, Cedric GROSS wrote: > Hello, > > > > Here is patch split 6. > > > > It's follow split 5 as it implement PAN context. > > This patch is purely based on work done by Sean Bruno. > > > > Cedric > > >