able to replicate this on an 8.4 XENHVM kernel -- perhaps
> this has now been fixed?
>
> When 9.2-RELEASE drops we should test there as well before closing
> this out.
Hi Mark,
You're certain TSO is enabled for the NIC? ie: Not disabled via
ifconfig or
ve.
Am I bound to UFS on xen?
And is it possible to use DVD-ROM in xen with XENHVM kernel?
Alex
___
freebsd-xen@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-xen
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-xen-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
Advance Domain Availability Notification:
We are writing to you today to notify you that lukemarsden.com will be
available by auction soon. You are receiving this message, since you have a
similar domain name
To confirm interest in owning this domain, fill out the simple form here:
lu
Hi,
The clock is Sync'd though, it should *stay* correct, right? So there
is a bug?
On Mon, 30 May 2011 09:39:06 +0100, Vincent Hoffman wrote:
Try running ntpd rather than one off ntpdate?
I have plenty of physical machines that need this anyway.
Vince
On 30/05/2011 05:41, Alex wrote
/rc.d/ntpdate start
Setting date via ntp.
30 May 14:37:41 ntpdate[8207]: step time server 203.171.85.237 offset
958.736122 sec
srv# date
Mon May 30 14:37:43 EST 2011
-
Is there any fix for this?
Thanks, Alex.
___
freebs
Hi,
Just started seeing this:
xennet_get_responses: too many frags 7 > max 5
xennet_get_responses: too many frags 6 > max 5
xennet_get_responses: too many frags 6 > max 5
xennet_get_responses: too many frags 6 > max 5
xennet_get_responses: too many frags 6 > max 5
xennet_get_responses: too many
I mentioned it and found TSO to be the cause. if someone else has seen
this issue too, would you mind getting them to comment on PR 154428?
Thanks!
On 02/19/11 02:10, Ivan Voras wrote:
On 18 February 2011 15:06, Hugo Silva wrote:
Performance seems to be acceptable. There's a gotcha with PF,
The following reply was made to PR kern/154302; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Alex
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/154302: [xen] [panic] [patch] xn0: Error 2 parsing
device/vif/0/mac
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 23:15:25 +1100
Thirded. My Xen VPS is unusable without this
The following reply was made to PR kern/154428; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Alex
To: Cc: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org, bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: kern/154428: xn0 network interface and PF - Massive performance
drop
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 23:07:29 +1100
I stumbled across PR 135178
I stumbled across PR 135178, perhaps there is some relationship with
these PR's, though the reporter of that PR has not responded in some time.
On 02/13/11 15:31, Colin Percival wrote:
On 02/12/11 20:18, Alex wrote:
Fixed by net.inet.tcp.tso: 1 -> 0
but why?? found this by trial
On 02/13/11 19:40, Nick Sayer wrote:
The following reply was made to PR kern/154302; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Nick Sayer
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org, sn...@epipe.com
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/154302: [xen] [panic] [patch] xn0: Error 2 parsing
device/vif/0/mac
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 00:36:
The following reply was made to PR kern/154428; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: alex
To: Cc: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: kern/154428: xn0 network interface and PF - Massive performance
drop
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 15:45:28 +1100
Beats me. Perhaps someone can look into it as i am
The following reply was made to PR kern/154428; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: alex
To:
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/154428: [xen] xn0 network interface and PF - Massive
performance drop
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 15:21:20 +1100
Fixed by net.inet.tcp.tso: 1 -> 0
but why?? found this by tr
On 02/01/11 16:40, Alex wrote:
The following reply was made to PR kern/154428; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Alex
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/154428: xn0 network interface and PF - Massive performance
drop
Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 14:29:58 +1100
Confirmed problem
The following reply was made to PR kern/154428; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: alex
To:
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/154428: [xen] xn0 network interface and PF - Massive
performance drop
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 14:01:51 +1100
Hi,
Any update on this? I've had to disable external connec
The following reply was made to PR kern/154428; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Alex
To: bug-follo...@freebsd.org
Cc:
Subject: Re: kern/154428: xn0 network interface and PF - Massive performance
drop
Date: Tue, 01 Feb 2011 14:29:58 +1100
Confirmed problem still evident in 8.2 RC3 (did a
Hi guys,
I managed to get the XENHVM kernel working, obviously I had to adjust my
pf.conf as the network interface is now xn0 instead of re0. All i did
was edit the config, and replace all instances of re0 with xn0. The
performance seems to be aweful. I was wondering why network connectivity
This problem seems to have disappeared, the only thing i have done in
the config at my VPS provider was mount a cdrom image..
On 28/01/11 08:29, Alex wrote:
I've had that geom warning before on real hardware and it's never
stopped it from working.
In my screenshot, it appears th
Hi Justin,
I am using FreeBSD as the OS on a VPS (Xen HVM). Do you think the VPS
provider will provide that information without too much drama?
On 29/01/11 10:26, Justin T. Gibbs wrote:
On 1/27/2011 2:29 PM, Alex wrote:
I've had that geom warning before on real hardware and it
Hi Nick,
Would you mind showing me a copy of your dmesg for the XENHVM kernel? I
just want to make a comparison with mine.
Perhaps this subject may get someone else's attention, otherwise I'll
file a PR.
:)
On 28/01/2011 9:40 AM, Nick Sayer wrote:
On Jan 27, 2011, at 1:29 PM,
partitioning, I am not sure what you mean. I have this
configured as a VPS so I want to avoid doing anything that may destroy
data on the disk.
On 28/01/11 06:29, Nick Sayer wrote:
On Jan 27, 2011, at 1:43 AM, Alex wrote:
I've applied this patch, I now get past the ethernet issue,
I've applied this patch, I now get past the ethernet issue, and have run
into another problem, see screenshot:
http://ahhyes.net/xen1.jpg
any ideas?
___
freebsd-xen@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-xen
To uns
It's would be a logical conclusion that it's an issue with the "re"
driver then. I cant get my 8.2-RC1 XENHVM kernel to boot so had to
resort to GENERIC, the HVM kernel just panics and I remember seeing
something along the lines of "do something smart?"
does this patch you mention fix that?
O
is 154236. Would
Greatly appreciate it.
Thanks in advance.
On 26/01/11 17:59, Janne Snabb wrote:
On Wed, 26 Jan 2011, Alex wrote:
I am having an issue with high network interface collisions when running
freebsd under XEN (I am using freebsd as my OS for a VPS).
[..]
whether they have seen
Hi guys,
I am having an issue with high network interface collisions when running
freebsd under XEN (I am using freebsd as my OS for a VPS).
I have filed a PR at http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=154236
and have had some discussion with the driver maintainer, we're both at a
loss as
Found something interesting from an email sent by the daily cron:
Name Mtu Network Address Ipkts Ierrs Idrop Opkts Oerrs Coll
re0 1500 00:16:3e:f0:8b:6c 160763 0 0 12053 0 12024
Uptime is about a day, 12024 collisions. That couldnt be good! Houston
we have a problem. Now whether this is a bug
-
The XENHVM options commented out causes the VM not to boot (seems to
hang after saying it's found a generic block device attached to the
xenpci bus (virtual hard disk) and that it's adding it as ad0. The
calcru: runtime messages are rather puzzling, perhaps this is related t
On śro, 2009-06-17 at 14:27 +0200, Kai Mosebach wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> do you run 32bit on a 32 or 64bit dom0? Maybe you should try a more recent
> version of Xen (RHEL has 3.1)
> This repo might help you :
The host is x86_64.
> http://www.gitco.de/linux/x86_64/centos/5/rpm
n /usr/src.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/src.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/src.
Also, during the mentioned buildworld the following syscall error
happened:
lock order reversal:
1st 0xc393b81c snaplk (snaplk)
@ /usr/home/alex/bsd/sys/kern/vfs_vnops.c:295
2nd 0xc441037c ufs (ufs)
@ /usr/home/alex/bsd/
from grounds up without having to keep a separate FreeBSD box for
building bootstrap?
TIA
Alex
___
freebsd-xen@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-xen
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-xe
30 matches
Mail list logo