Helo,
Now that XENHVM has been merged into the GENERIC kernel, I recompiled todays
-CURRENT (rev 255904)
and hit the following panic. It seeems to be HyperV related.
GENERIC without "device hyperv" works properly. The hypervisor is XenServer 6.2.
# HyperV drivers
device hyperv
On 27-Sep-2013, at 8:20 PM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On 27/09/13 08:16, Shanker Balan wrote:
>> Helo,
>>
>> Now that XENHVM has been merged into the GENERIC kernel, I recompiled todays
>> -CURRENT (rev 255904)
>> and hit the following panic. It seeems to
(Doing a proper reply all now)
On 27-Sep-2013, at 8:34 PM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
> On 27/09/13 16:59, Shanker Balan wrote:
>> Roger,
>>
>> Thank you very much for looking into the issue.
>>
>> Can I have a SVN version of the patch? "patch" does
On 27-Sep-2013, at 9:59 PM, Shanker Balan wrote:
> (Doing a proper reply all now)
>
> On 27-Sep-2013, at 8:34 PM, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>
>> On 27/09/13 16:59, Shanker Balan wrote:
>>> Roger,
>>>
>>> Thank you very much for looking into the is
On 04-Oct-2013, at 1:02 PM, Sergey Nasonov wrote:
>
>
> >I just tried FreeBSD 10 ALPHA4 ISO. The ISO fails to boot on
> >XenServer 6.2 resulting with the same HyperV panic
> >
> >Regards.
> >@shankerbalan
>
> Hi,
> You can disable viridian support for that VM by command:
> xe vm-param-set pla
On 04-Oct-2013, at 5:35 PM, Sergey Nasonov wrote:
> >Hi Sergey,
> >
> >Thank you very much for suggesting the workaround.
> >
> >My use case is for users uploading the ISO to CloudStack private cloud and
> >not being able to
> >install FreeBSD 10. As an end user of cloudstack, I don't have acces
On 04-Oct-2013, at 9:09 PM, Shanker Balan wrote:
> On 04-Oct-2013, at 5:35 PM, Sergey Nasonov wrote:
>
>>> Hi Sergey,
>>>
>>> Thank you very much for suggesting the workaround.
>>>
>>> My use case is for users uploading the ISO to
On 08-Oct-2013, at 9:19 PM, Mark Felder wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 8, 2013, at 9:45, Josias L.G wrote:
>> Problem with Citrix Xen 6.2 and install from ISO. The "solution" was
>> remove cd-rom drive from virtual machine. Not possible now with xen
>> default in GENERIC kernel.
>> Message error:
>> run_i
On 09-Oct-2013, at 8:06 PM, Mark Felder wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 9, 2013, at 8:53, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>> On 09/10/13 13:49, Mark Felder wrote:
>>> On Wed, Oct 9, 2013, at 2:46, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>>>> On 09/10/13 08:18, Shanker Balan wrote:
>>>>
On 10-Oct-2013, at 1:37 PM, Shanker Balan wrote:
> On 09-Oct-2013, at 8:06 PM, Mark Felder wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Oct 9, 2013, at 8:53, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
>>> On 09/10/13 13:49, Mark Felder wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Oct 9, 2013, at 2:46, Roger Pau Monné wrote:
On 13-Oct-2013, at 8:18 AM, Justin T. Gibbs wrote:
> On Oct 10, 2013, at 3:09 AM, Shanker Balan wrote:
>
>>
>> On 10-Oct-2013, at 1:37 PM, Shanker Balan wrote:
>>
>>> On 09-Oct-2013, at 8:06 PM, Mark Felder wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, Oc
On 28-Dec-2013, at 9:54 pm, Karl Pielorz wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I just updated a Xen guest here (I'm running FreeBSD under XenServer 6.2 on
> an Intel E3 based machine).
>
> I went from 9.2-STABLE to 10 'stable' (i.e. I just checked out base/stable/10
> - and built it).
>
> svn info shows it's
On 29-Dec-2013, at 4:44 pm, Karl Pielorz wrote:
>
>
> --On 28 December 2013 23:55:06 +0530 Shanker Balan
> wrote:
>
>> FreeBSD 10 RC3 r259778 is what I am running under XenServer 6.2 here which
>> seems to work fine.
>>
>> root@gw1-1:~ # uname -a
>
Comments inline.
On 12-Apr-2014, at 9:29 pm, Anjan Upadhya wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We are experimenting with FreeBSD 10 GENERIC kernel on Citrix XenServer 6.2
> and build number 70446c.
>
> Our assumption from reading the FBSD 10 docs is that now being a Xen guest
> is natively supported and we don't
14 matches
Mail list logo
