http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=40535 >
Christoph Petschnig wrote on Oct 25, 05:38 (-0700):
> PS: RT shows: Guests should email [EMAIL PROTECTED] to create tickets
> That mail address does not work
Where is this, exactly?
Christian
--
Christian Knoke* * *
Can you elaborate more on the freeciv-web application? What's the
difference between that and gui-web?
-jason
___
Freeciv-dev mailing list
Freeciv-dev@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=40539 >
Currently fortress (and likely other bases) cannot be pillaged.
Pillage command is not sensitive when tile has only fortress. Tested
with gtk-client.
It certainly worked at the time I wrote #40501
- ML
___
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=40538 >
$subject
- ML
diff -Nurd -X.diff_ignore freeciv/server/citytools.c freeciv/server/citytools.c
--- freeciv/server/citytools.c 2008-10-27 04:13:36.0 +0200
+++ freeciv/server/citytools.c 2008-10-27 04:53:46.0 +0200
@@ -229
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=40536 >
2008/10/25 Pepeto:
>
> - Air patrol doesn't crash any more.
> - Way points works as expected.
> - Client's goto command forbid to move to dangerous tiles (like it
> already does for triremes). Using numeric pad can be used instead to
> reach
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=40536 >
The attached patch fixes many related with pf code for air goto:
- Revisions 13941, 13944 and 13958 are reversed, because there are
totally inefficient (notably way points) and non-tested (many crashes).
- Air patrol doesn't crash any more.
-
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=40535 >
Hello!
When starting civclient and quitting right away (first screen),
.civclientrc in C:\Users\\AppData\Roaming gets overwritten and
customization is lost.
Hope that helps. Best regards
Christoph
PS: RT shows: Guests should email [EMAIL
Hi Jason, great to see you taking interest in this.
On Fri, 24 Oct 2008, Jason Dorje Short wrote:
> Okay, I admit at the start that I've missed a lot of discussion on
> this, so I may be quite ignorant about what's going on.
>
> The freeciv-web interface seems conceptually sound, and at least
> pa
