Update of bug #15721 (project freeciv):
Status: Ready For Test = Fixed
Open/Closed:Open = Closed
___
Reply to this item at:
Update of bug #15721 (project freeciv):
Status:None = Ready For Test
Assigned to:None = pepeto
Planned Release: = 2.1.12
Follow-up Comment #5, bug #15721 (project freeciv):
I haven't got round to looking into this in any detail, but...
it seems rather a shame for pf_map_new() to silently ignore some
of the parameters requested; the error message helped the
diagnosis of this error.
Is there any pressing need
Follow-up Comment #4, bug #15721 (project freeciv):
I haven't got round to looking into this in any detail, but... it seems
rather a shame for pf_map_new() to silently ignore some of the parameters
requested; the error message helped the diagnosis of this error.
Is there any pressing need to
Follow-up Comment #2, bug #15721 (project freeciv):
I checked the old behaviour: it was ignoring dangers. Is it better? Else, I
could implement the missing functions, but it will take time.
___
Reply to this item at:
Follow-up Comment #3, bug #15721 (project freeciv):
Attached a fix to get the old behaviour. But keeping ignoring the dangerous
position. Note also it prefers pf_fuel_map to pf_danger_map.
(file #8707, file #8708, file #8709)
___
URL:
http://gna.org/bugs/?15721
Summary: S2_1 connect (road, irrigation etc) broken: jumbo
callbacks for danger maps are not yet implemented.
Project: Freeciv
Submitted by: jtn
Submitted on: Sunday 03/28/10 at 02:42
Follow-up Comment #1, bug #15721 (project freeciv):
I wonder if it's trying to use a danger map because of
base_unsafe_terrain_loss_pct() (in pft_fill_unit_parameter()). That would
explain why it doesn't apply to S2_2. Not proven though.
