Follow-up Comment #20, bug #18767 (project freeciv):
Just to clarify, the CMA does not look at the value of gold_upkeep_style.
I have not looked at, why gold_upkeep_style=2 could resolve the issue (as
described in comment #13), as the flawed pruning caused (at least in my game)
many unnecessary
Follow-up Comment #18, bug #18767 (project freeciv):
Checking Echter Name's savegame (file #15373), in the one city I checked
(11z+Frres), there was a single taxman cost of buildings was 20 and issue
went away with gold_upkeep_style=2. So I think that it shows the same issue.
(S2_4 r22344.)
Follow-up Comment #19, bug #18767 (project freeciv):
...and checking before-and-after patch #3620 on S2_4 (this time with the
savegames in bug #17542), the spurious taxmen which were reproducible before
and went away with gold_upkeep_style=2 now never show up; governor
decisions/output seem the
Follow-up Comment #17, bug #18767 (project freeciv):
I have taken a detailed look at the cma branch bound algorithm, and found
the implemented pruning to be severely flawed. IMHO this is the cause for the
described problems.
I submitted patch #3620 , see there for additional details.
Follow-up Comment #14, bug #18767 (project freeciv):
I think You have your own save game now but ...
Do You still want one or more savegames with wannabetaxmen?
___
Reply to this item at:
http://gna.org/bugs/?18767
Follow-up Comment #15, bug #18767 (project freeciv):
It wouldn't hurt to see your savegame, to confirm the cause of your taxmen is
the same as that in bug #17542.
___
Reply to this item at:
http://gna.org/bugs/?18767
Additional Item Attachment, bug #18767 (project freeciv):
File name: freeciv-T0247-Y01702-manual.sav.bz2 Size:70 KB
___
Reply to this item at:
http://gna.org/bugs/?18767
___
Nachricht
Follow-up Comment #16, bug #18767 (project freeciv):
file #15373
___
Reply to this item at:
http://gna.org/bugs/?18767
___
Nachricht gesendet von/durch Gna!
http://gna.org/
Update of bug #18767 (project freeciv):
Status:None = Ready For Test
___
Reply to this item at:
http://gna.org/bugs/?18767
___
Message sent
Additional Item Attachment, bug #18767 (project freeciv):
File name: 13353727.jpg Size:384 KB
___
Reply to this item at:
http://gna.org/bugs/?18767
___
Message sent
Follow-up Comment #12, bug #18767 (project freeciv):
I don't know the details of the CMA algorithm, but I think Pekka's patch is
suggesting that local gold usage by the city is causing the spurious tax
collectors. I.e., if a city has lots of buildings/units consuming gold, it
feels like it needs
Follow-up Comment #13, bug #18767 (project freeciv):
I wrote:
A concrete way to test whether any of this is relevant would
be to change the ruleset to set gold_upkeep_style=2 _[...]_
and see if the CMA's behaviour changes.
I tried this with the savefile in bug #17542, and the taxmen went
Follow-up Comment #11, bug #18767 (project freeciv):
...the second patch in file #14947 is correct one. I have a feeling that
Savane does not like me. *;-)
___
Reply to this item at:
http://gna.org/bugs/?18767
Follow-up Comment #10, bug #18767 (project freeciv):
Hmph. Somehow I managed to post wrong patch.
(file #14947)
___
Additional Item Attachment:
File name: 0001-cm-no-minimum-for-gold-lux-science-production.patch Size:0 KB
Follow-up Comment #9, bug #18767 (project freeciv):
Hmph. Somehow I managed to post wrong patch.
___
Reply to this item at:
http://gna.org/bugs/?18767
___
Message sent via/by Gna!
Follow-up Comment #7, bug #18767 (project freeciv):
Looks like the min_production in cm_state is initialized (or used)
incorrectly.
CM uses a heuristics to prune unpromising solutions without actually
evaluating them. If the city uses enough gold, the CM will prune early on all
the solutions
Follow-up Comment #8, bug #18767 (project freeciv):
Patch attached. Seems to work pretty fine.
(file #14839)
___
Additional Item Attachment:
File name: 0001-cm-no-minimum-for-gold-lux-science-production.patch Size:4 KB
Follow-up Comment #2, bug #18767 (project freeciv):
no matter which options i altered, cma always uses one worker as
tax collector
Do you meant that this happened to one specific city, or does cma always, for
all cities, use one worker as tax collector?
Follow-up Comment #3, bug #18767 (project freeciv):
in various cities, like in this example, cmagents use one worker as tax
collector. i do not know why i did not write it down, but today i am pretty
sure, that i had cities during that time with two forced tax collectors
too.
that was my
Follow-up Comment #4, bug #18767 (project freeciv):
If i may be permitted to speculate, i'd say that the CMA seems to divert as
many workers to tax collectors as it can and still feed the city. Thus, more
irrigation and more specials that provide bonus food lead to more taxmen.
Additional Item Attachment, bug #18767 (project freeciv):
File name: 1maxproduktion.jpg Size:137 KB
File name: 2maxluxus.jpg Size:134 KB
___
Reply to this item at:
http://gna.org/bugs/?18767
Update of bug #18767 (project freeciv):
Category:None = agents
___
Reply to this item at:
http://gna.org/bugs/?18767
___
Message sent
Follow-up Comment #1, bug #18767 (project freeciv):
See also bug #17542.
___
Reply to this item at:
http://gna.org/bugs/?18767
___
Message sent via/by Gna!
http://gna.org/
URL:
http://gna.org/bugs/?18767
Summary: cma: always 1 tax collector
Project: Freeciv
Submitted by: gaymmaster
Submitted on: Sa 01 Okt 2011 18:04:29 GMT
Category: None
Severity: 3 - Normal
24 matches
Mail list logo
