Update of patch #2542 (project freeciv):
Planned Release: 2.4.0 =
___
Reply to this item at:
http://gna.org/patch/?2542
___
Message sent
Follow-up Comment #6, patch #2542 (project freeciv):
For what it's worth, I would prefer everything (ruleset +
options) to be in one big file in an option = value format.
I fully concur with that, but we shouldn't require that people hack a file
'manually'. There should still be some sort
Follow-up Comment #3, patch #2542 (project freeciv):
As a general, the elements that have the greatest influence on
gameplay and strategy should be the easiest to find and change.
Therefore I want to move this options to server settings (ruleset category).
The options menu is likely to
Follow-up Comment #4, patch #2542 (project freeciv):
I am against the tree view. OpenTTD uses it, and I get lost every time and
end up browsing thru every option anyway. For what it's worth, I would prefer
everything (ruleset + options) to be in one big file in an option = value
format.
Follow-up Comment #5, patch #2542 (project freeciv):
For what it's worth, I would prefer everything (ruleset +
options) to be in one big file in an option = value format.
This is possible using the fixed settings in the ruleset file. I plan to move
other ruleset option to server settings which
Follow-up Comment #2, patch #2542 (project freeciv):
As a general, the elements that have the greatest influence on gameplay and
strategy should be the easiest to find and change. The options menu is likely
to trend toward complexity as time goes on, essentially becoming a 'trainer'
or
Update of patch #2542 (project freeciv):
Depends on: = patch #2544
___
Reply to this item at:
http://gna.org/patch/?2542
___
Nachricht
