URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39854
Oops added to wrong category:) it should be in 'general'
[esminis - Sun Nov 11 07:30:07 2007]:
This bug tracking system is very simple and it is hard to track bugs, no
milestones, no SVN view, etc.(or maybe I dont see that as
URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39831
This transaction appears to have no content
Good. Promoted sounds perfect in this context.
Joan
2007/11/11, William Allen Simpson [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39831
Joan Creus wrote:
URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=16811
[esminis - Sun Nov 11 07:30:07 2007]:
This bug tracking system is very simple and it is hard to track bugs, no
milestones, no SVN view, etc.(or maybe I dont see that as reporter).
Other bug tracking systems could be used here:
URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=16811
On 11/11/07, Tautvydas Andrikys [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=16811
Well there is a solution for hosting: bugs can be tracked using
sourceforge or launchpad issue trackers. Possibly
URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39846
Ticket can be closed now.
[esminis - Fri Nov 09 05:06:15 2007]:
I want account couse i have already reported some bugs as guest and will
report some bugs or features later, ussually with patches.
Maybe later I will join dev
URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=16811
Well there is a solution for hosting: bugs can be tracked using
sourceforge or launchpad issue trackers. Possibly all project can be
moved to sourceforge or launchpad
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - Sun Nov 11 09:43:21 2007]:
On Nov 11, 2007
URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=16811
Are u sure that they wouldnt let to import issue database?
Yea we could use gna.org tracker, it is much better than current.
Daniel Markstedt wrote:
URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=16811
On 11/11/07, Tautvydas
URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39852
That's right, this function is wrong, else, there shouldn't be any problem.
Your patch forbid the moves for path bigger than 1 turn.
You should name your fuel variable moves_left or something like this,
since it's a number of moves and
URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=16811
On Sun, 2007-11-11 at 01:43 -0800, Erik Johansson wrote:
URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=16811
On Nov 11, 2007 8:30 AM, Tautvydas Andrikys [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
URL:
URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=16811
On Nov 11, 2007 5:43 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From the hosting standpoint, if freeciv.org becomes a 401c3, then it
could collect donations so that it could pay for its own hosting if it
had to.
The problem has
URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39852
Pepeto _ wrote:
I think when you will get all this, you will conclude on a quite
identical patch than PR#20772.
The rejected patch(es) in PR#20772 did not address the underlying problem
that this patch corrects. Those patches
URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39852
Well, I ignore what you can write against me... Look at this savegame,
and say me that this stealth fighter can move to P1 and not go to
dangerous positions.
airgoto.sav.gz
Description: GNU Zip compressed data
URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39856
On Nov 11, 2007 9:23 PM, wrote:
the data is not saved correctly: production slots are wrong. when I
produced in a city a certain thing, it is another one produced. When I
load the attached game everything seams to be okay. But after
URL: http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=12768
[rp - Mon Apr 11 16:30:48 2005]:
In 2.0.0-rc1 an observer can join, observe an existing player, and then
issue an aitoggle command on some player. Is this level of control
supposed to be allowed to observers? (I have only tried
14 matches
Mail list logo
