[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #14097] wish: cities reclaim resources when enemy units are gone
Follow-up Comment #1, bug #14097 (project freeciv): I would suggest enabling the Citizen Governor. It eliminates most cases like this, and warns you immediately otherwise. ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/bugs/?14097 ___ Message sent via/by Gna! http://gna.org/ ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #14556] gdk_color_to_string() used, but only gtk+ 2.4 required
Follow-up Comment #5, bug #14556 (project freeciv): In trunk we can simply bump the requirement as done with attached patch. After I got same error from build with *latest* cygwin, I consider gtk+ 2.12 too high a requirement even in trunk. However, we should be aware that staying with lower requirement than we actually have any reason to just causes unnecessary maintenance work and less than ideal implementations as we duplicate features of newer requirement libraries in our own code. ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/bugs/?14556 ___ Message sent via/by Gna! http://gna.org/ ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
Re: [Freeciv-Dev] Towards 2.2
2009/10/20 Pepeto pepet...@gmail.com: Hello men, could we create metatickets for 2.1.10 release and 2.2-beta1 at gna to see how far are we from it? Maybe we could create a ticket in tasks? There certainly is enough bugfixes gone in since 2.1.9 to justify 2.1.10 release as soon as possible. Especially since 2.1.9 still instructs to use old bugtracker and uses temporary metaserver URL. However we also have one serious regression since 2.1.9, which we don't want to have in release ( bug #13465 ) I don't think we need a metaticket that depends on just one other ticket. Also, I'd rather create new metaticket for 2.2 in general, and not separately for beta1. At least that's the way we've done it in previous releases. Note that there is already 2.2 metaticket in RT. Beta1 should be released as soon as editor support for start positions is finished and any critical bugs are fixed. Also, there can be no new mandatory capabilities after beta1 release, so anything requiring such should go in before beta1. - ML ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
Re: [Freeciv-Dev] S2_2 and capstrings
2009/10/18 Daniel Markstedt markst...@gmail.com: I can't seem to connect to my S2_2 server with my S2_2 client - the connection is refused due to mismatching capstrings. Namely, the server is asking for +2.1g CreatedName voteinfo. Has this been resolved, or should we open bugtracker ticket about it? - ML ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] [patch #1335] map_has_startpos()
Update of patch #1335 (project freeciv): Status: Ready For Test = Done Assigned to:None = cazfi Open/Closed:Open = Closed ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/patch/?1335 ___ Message sent via/by Gna! http://gna.org/ ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
Re: [Freeciv-Dev] S2_2 and capstrings
I left Daniel on IRC before knowing if he resolved that or not... Le mercredi 21 octobre 2009 à 16:03 +0300, Marko Lindqvist a écrit : 2009/10/18 Daniel Markstedt markst...@gmail.com: I can't seem to connect to my S2_2 server with my S2_2 client - the connection is refused due to mismatching capstrings. Namely, the server is asking for +2.1g CreatedName voteinfo. Has this been resolved, or should we open bugtracker ticket about it? ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #14556] gdk_color_to_string() used, but only gtk+ 2.4 required
Follow-up Comment #6, bug #14556 (project freeciv): However, we should be aware that staying with lower requirement than we actually have any reason to just causes unnecessary maintenance work and less than ideal implementations as we duplicate features of newer requirement libraries in our own code. I totally agree with that. And applying my patch would fix the problem without requesting any requirement more. ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/bugs/?14556 ___ Message posté via/par Gna! http://gna.org/ ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #14568] FTBFS trunk 16165
Follow-up Comment #1, bug #14568 (project freeciv): This is quite crazy, what is not a constant in that expression? I don't get this error... Could someone who get this error make a patch? ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/bugs/?14568 ___ Message posté via/par Gna! http://gna.org/ ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #14562] assertion `GDK_IS_DRAWABLE (drawable)' failed
Update of bug #14562 (project freeciv): Assigned to:None = pepeto ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/bugs/?14562 ___ Message posté via/par Gna! http://gna.org/ ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #14515] Behaviour of hydro/nuclear/solar plants etc doesn't match documentation
Update of bug #14515 (project freeciv): Assigned to:None = pepeto ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/bugs/?14515 ___ Message posté via/par Gna! http://gna.org/ ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #14562] assertion `GDK_IS_DRAWABLE (drawable)' failed
Update of bug #14562 (project freeciv): Status:None = Ready For Test ___ Follow-up Comment #1: Fix attached. (file #7048) ___ Additional Item Attachment: File name: trunk_S2_2_gdk_is_drawable_assertion.diff Size:0 KB ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/bugs/?14562 ___ Message posté via/par Gna! http://gna.org/ ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #14567] Selection tool is not redrawn
Update of bug #14567 (project freeciv): Status:None = Invalid Assigned to:None = pepeto Open/Closed:Open = Closed ___ Follow-up Comment #1: I cannot reproduce anymore... ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/bugs/?14567 ___ Message posté via/par Gna! http://gna.org/ ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #14566] 1: handle_unit_orders() invalid Workers (494) activity 2 (should be 0)
Update of bug #14566 (project freeciv): Status:None = Ready For Test Assigned to:None = pepeto ___ Follow-up Comment #1: Clearing orders just needs an ACTIVITY_IDLE request if it's not the case. Else really request explicitly that. (file #7051) ___ Additional Item Attachment: File name: trunk_S2_2_clear_unit_orders.diff Size:0 KB ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/bugs/?14566 ___ Message posté via/par Gna! http://gna.org/ ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #14570] Editor vision tool cleanup
URL: http://gna.org/bugs/?14570 Summary: Editor vision tool cleanup Project: Freeciv Submitted by: pepeto Submitted on: mercredi 21.10.2009 à 22:53 Category: editor Severity: 3 - Normal Priority: 5 - Normal Status: Ready For Test Assigned to: pepeto Originator Email: Open/Closed: Open Release: Discussion Lock: Any Operating System: None Planned Release: 2.2.0 ___ Details: The attached patch fixes: * map_clear_known() resets the seen information. * map_show_tile() really transfer the data to the shared vision players. The condition was exactly the inverse. * Added map_hide() to hide the tile knowledge to a group of players (linked with shared vision). ___ File Attachments: --- Date: mercredi 21.10.2009 à 22:53 Name: trunk_S2_2_edit_vision.diff Size: 5 ko By: pepeto http://gna.org/bugs/download.php?file_id=7054 ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/bugs/?14570 ___ Message posté via/par Gna! http://gna.org/ ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #14549] Crash - unknown cause
Follow-up Comment #7, bug #14549 (project freeciv): For me, it takes some hours of playing to make it crash. May be, it could be done to implement the --sync parameter, as suggested it the error report from gdk-gtk library. ___ Reply to this item at: http://gna.org/bugs/?14549 ___ Message sent via/by Gna! http://gna.org/ ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
Re: [Freeciv-Dev] S2_2 and capstrings
I managed to resolve it somehow after cleaning up old builds and rebuilding the relevant code. It was probably a case of a 2.2 client trying to connect to a 2.1 server. On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 9:45 PM, Pepeto pepet...@gmail.com wrote: I left Daniel on IRC before knowing if he resolved that or not... Le mercredi 21 octobre 2009 à 16:03 +0300, Marko Lindqvist a écrit : 2009/10/18 Daniel Markstedt markst...@gmail.com: I can't seem to connect to my S2_2 server with my S2_2 client - the connection is refused due to mismatching capstrings. Namely, the server is asking for +2.1g CreatedName voteinfo. Has this been resolved, or should we open bugtracker ticket about it? ___ Freeciv-dev mailing list Freeciv-dev@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
