Update of bug #16710 (project freeciv):
Status: Need Info = Invalid
Assigned to:None = cazfi
Open/Closed:Open = Closed
Follow-up Comment #6, bug #16710 (project freeciv):
I still don't see in which situation current code would lead to error. In
usual case base ownership is loaded from savegame, and it is used. Only if
savegame is illegal (for the current code, it may have been legal situation
when game was saved
Update of bug #16710 (project freeciv):
Status:None = Need Info
___
Reply to this item at:
http://gna.org/bugs/?16710
___
Message sent
Follow-up Comment #4, bug #16710 (project freeciv):
In which case this is an error? Though I don't see what situation it would be
needed either.
___
Reply to this item at:
http://gna.org/bugs/?16710
Follow-up Comment #5, bug #16710 (project freeciv):
Though I don't see what situation it would be needed either.
In case of illegal savegame of course. This code probably prevents modified
savegame from crashing the server on some later phase.
Update of bug #16710 (project freeciv):
Planned Release:2.2.4, 2.3.0 = 2.2.5, 2.3.0
___
Reply to this item at:
http://gna.org/bugs/?16710
___
Message sent
Update of bug #16710 (project freeciv):
Assigned to: pepeto = None
___
Reply to this item at:
http://gna.org/bugs/?16710
___
Message posté
Update of bug #16710 (project freeciv):
Assigned to:None = pepeto
___
Reply to this item at:
http://gna.org/bugs/?16710
___
Message posté
Follow-up Comment #3, bug #16710 (project freeciv):
See also bug #15684.
___
Reply to this item at:
http://gna.org/bugs/?16710
___
Message posté via/par Gna!
http://gna.org/
Follow-up Comment #2, bug #16710 (project freeciv):
In bug #16385 I've got plans to add an explicit capturable base flag to
separate the current implicit capturing behaviour.
(Regardless of that, base ownership shouldn't change over a save/load cycle,
of course.)
10 matches
Mail list logo
