Follow-up Comment #4, bug #23300 (project freeciv):
(in practice, same than martial law but without the need of
garrison units)
If that's the goal, Force_Content might be more appropriate (it can work
against unhappiness caused by aggressive units)
Follow-up Comment #5, bug #23300 (project freeciv):
If that's the goal, Force_Content might be more appropriate (it can work
against unhappiness caused by aggressive units)
That is the goal, but in my tests, the martial law did not work against
unhappiness caused by aggressive units, either.
The
Follow-up Comment #3, bug #23300 (project freeciv):
Patch for S2_5 and S2_6.
Replace martial law effect by 3 extra content citizens in each city (in
practice, same than martial law but without the need of garrison units).
Switched civil war chance between Tribal and Despotism.
Updated government
Follow-up Comment #2, bug #23300 (project freeciv):
I'm testing to replace the extra martial law by 3 extra contents in every city
(same effect than standard martial law but without the need to keep military
units in the city).
I'll create the patch later.
Follow-up Comment #1, bug #23300 (project freeciv):
You are right.
This contradiction was caused by this patch #5763, that I made thinking of
balance more than context.
When I tested the old Tribal government without martial law, it was hard to
keep citizens happy, and I did not find it worth to
URL:
http://gna.org/bugs/?23300
Summary: Idea of Tribal government
Project: Freeciv
Submitted by: cazfi
Submitted on: Sat 21 Feb 2015 11:17:15 AM EET
Category: None
Severity: 3 - Normal
