Apparently without discussion, 2.1 has been officially abandoned, as 2.2
has been branched in the repository. I will no longer work on 2.1.
Unfortunately, nobody has yet added the 2.2 tag in RT. I cannot tag
things for 2.2, until then I won't be working on 2.2 either.
According to http://freeci
On 9/24/07, William Allen Simpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Apparently without discussion, 2.1 has been officially abandoned, as 2.2
> has been branched in the repository. I will no longer work on 2.1.
>
> Unfortunately, nobody has yet added the 2.2 tag in RT. I cannot tag
> things for 2.2, un
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39609 >
Committed trunk revision 13639.
Index: client/control.c
===
--- client/control.c(revision 13638)
+++ client/control.c(working copy)
@@ -59,7 +59,6 @@
static struct unit
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=37063 >
> [cproc - Wed Feb 28 01:14:16 2007]:
>
> > [emj - Di 27. Feb 2007, 12:08:14]:
> >
> > > [emj - Tir. 27. Feb. 2007 11:25:54]:
> > > _rl_forced_update_display
> > > _history_truncate_file
> > > stdinhand.c:4654: error: 'rl_attempted_completi
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, William Allen Simpson wrote:
> Apparently without discussion, 2.1 has been officially abandoned, as 2.2
> has been branched in the repository.
If you did not read the discussion, how could you reach the conclusion it
has been abandoned? The plan is still to release 2.1 soon (
Thanks, see (PR#39715) Crash when discovering a Future Tech.
In the future, please post to [EMAIL PROTECTED] for tracking.
___
Freeciv-dev mailing list
Freeciv-dev@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39715 >
Also reported by [EMAIL PROTECTED] on freeciv-dev list with savegame
and proposed patch:
Re: [Freeciv-Dev] Segfault bug in advance_has_flag in common/tech.c
Committed trunk revision 13640.
Index: server/techtools.c
On 9/24/07, Per I. Mathisen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, William Allen Simpson wrote:
> (...)
> > Unfortunately, nobody has yet added the 2.2 tag in RT. I cannot tag
> > things for 2.2, until then I won't be working on 2.2 either.
>
> Added. Anything else I need to to do?
>
Fi
Per I. Mathisen wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, William Allen Simpson wrote:
>> Apparently without discussion, 2.1 has been officially abandoned, as 2.2
>> has been branched in the repository.
>
> If you did not read the discussion, how could you reach the conclusion it
> has been abandoned? The pl
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=37063 >
I got a non tested working GNU readline framework (no need of fink or
darwin ports) that compile fine with freeciv if someone is interrested.
Let me know where to send it.
cheers
Francois
Le 24 sept. 07 à 10:22, Erik Johansson a écrit :
Check out the wiki forum - I have expanded it to roughly fill the
functions of our phpbb:
http://freeciv.wikia.com/wiki/Forum:Index
What could stop us from locking the old forums and direct users here?
~Daniel
___
Freeciv-dev mailing list
Freeciv-dev
On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, Erik Johansson wrote:
> Hi again
>
> I think I installed the pro version of resin and that's why it didn't
> work.. ;-) But it still doesn't work, I've attached a log and here is
> what I do:
>
> 1. I start resin
> 2. goto http://localhost:8080/
> 2.1 get a 404
>
> 3. goto http
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=39545 >
On 29/08/2007, Egor Vyscrebentsov wrote:
> > > On Sun, 12 Aug 2007 Marko Lindqvist wrote:
> > >
> > > > Noticed that freeciv.spec.in still contains package for gtk-client
> > > > (that is: gtk1.2). Attached patch fixes obvious errors from
>
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=15260 >
On 10/09/2007, Marko Lindqvist wrote:
> On 19/07/07, Ulrik Sverdrup wrote:
> >
> > Bug [for global observers, not attached to player] :
> > - 'Wonders of the World' and 'Top Five Cities' should be
> > available but doesn't currently have an
http://bugs.freeciv.org/Ticket/Display.html?id=38558 >
On 12/08/2007, Marko Lindqvist wrote:
>
> Attached related patches for S2_1 and trunk. S2_1 just adds client
> side legality check for phase number. Trunk version adds several
> asserts to help finding root cause bug.
As bug itself is (pr
On 9/24/07, William Allen Simpson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Per I. Mathisen wrote:
> > On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, William Allen Simpson wrote:
> >> Apparently without discussion, 2.1 has been officially abandoned, as 2.2
> >> has been branched in the repository.
> >
> > If you did not read the discuss
I guess the dev part is 'Contribution' - though it is ambiguously
named. Could you think of a better label?
~Daniel
On 9/24/07, François Marlier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> just great (in my case it means I can finaly access the freeciv forum !)
> can we have a dev part (or is a freeciv dev for
17 matches
Mail list logo
