[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #14515] Behaviour of hydro/nuclear/solar plants etc doesn't match documentation

Follow-up Comment #13, bug #14515 (project freeciv): perhaps an additional 'priority' flag could be used? On ruleset load there must be a check that for each effect no priority is duplicated. Furthermore, the effects must be saved in the corresponding order. _

[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #14515] Behaviour of hydro/nuclear/solar plants etc doesn't match documentation

Follow-up Comment #12, bug #14515 (project freeciv): I have already thought about this. But I concluded it was impossible (I don't remember the reason). And, actually, the order of the combination is even more unclear that the current behavior. __

[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #14515] Behaviour of hydro/nuclear/solar plants etc doesn't match documentation

Follow-up Comment #11, bug #14515 (project freeciv): > (This would be easier to express in the ruleset if the effects > system could combine numbers in more ways than just addition, > such as min() and max(). But that's probably a separate bug.) Perhaps an additional field could be added to the

[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #14515] Behaviour of hydro/nuclear/solar plants etc doesn't match documentation

Update of bug #14515 (project freeciv): Status: In Progress => Fixed Open/Closed:Open => Closed ___ Reply to this item at:

[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #14515] Behaviour of hydro/nuclear/solar plants etc doesn't match documentation

Follow-up Comment #8, bug #14515 (project freeciv): > We cannot change S2_1 documentation because it would require translation jobs. Boo. Well, I've updated the wiki . > Me neither, but I think you are

[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #14515] Behaviour of hydro/nuclear/solar plants etc doesn't match documentation

Update of bug #14515 (project freeciv): Status: Fixed => In Progress Open/Closed: Closed => Open ___ Follow-up Comment #7: Reopening this tic

[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #14515] Behaviour of hydro/nuclear/solar plants etc doesn't match documentation

Follow-up Comment #6, bug #14515 (project freeciv): Sorry to comment on a closed bug, but there are a couple of loose ends on this subject: Firstly, the docs for S2_1 need the same fix as S2_2/trunk (but the behaviour is fine). I've attached a patch for that. Secondly, the same priority problem

[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #14515] Behaviour of hydro/nuclear/solar plants etc doesn't match documentation

Update of bug #14515 (project freeciv): Status: Ready For Test => Fixed Open/Closed:Open => Closed ___ Reply to this item at:

[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #14515] Behaviour of hydro/nuclear/solar plants etc doesn't match documentation

Update of bug #14515 (project freeciv): Status:None => Ready For Test ___ Follow-up Comment #3: Your patch looks to fix all the issues. However, I'm uncertain about the effect_recycling_cente

[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #14515] Behaviour of hydro/nuclear/solar plants etc doesn't match documentation

Follow-up Comment #2, bug #14515 (project freeciv): cazfi writes: > Yes, it's deliberate rule change. OK, thanks. I'm assuming the principle that you should always get the single best pollution bonus from all your buildings you have, since no-one's objected. So, here's a second version of my p

[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #14515] Behaviour of hydro/nuclear/solar plants etc doesn't match documentation

Follow-up Comment #1, bug #14515 (project freeciv): > This is particularly obvious with Solar Plant -- if you only > have a Factory, pollution is only reduced to half, not > eliminated. > Is this deliberate? If so, the documentation needs patching; if > not, the ruleset. Yes, it's deliberate ru

[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #14515] Behaviour of hydro/nuclear/solar plants etc doesn't match documentation

Update of bug #14515 (project freeciv): Assigned to:None => pepeto ___ Reply to this item at: ___ Message pos

[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #14515] Behaviour of hydro/nuclear/solar plants etc doesn't match documentation

URL: Summary: Behaviour of hydro/nuclear/solar plants etc doesn't match documentation Project: Freeciv Submitted by: jtn Submitted on: Wednesday 14/10/09 at 00:02 Category: rulesets