[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #21795] fortify action more even in concurrent mode

[Jacob Nevins]

Follow-up Comment #3, bug #21795 (project freeciv):

See also bug #23516.

___

Reply to this item at:

  

___
  Message sent via/by Gna!
  http://gna.org/


___
Freeciv-dev mailing list
Freeciv-dev@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev

[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #21795] fortify action more even in concurrent mode

[Jacob Nevins]

Follow-up Comment #4, bug #21795 (project freeciv):

> - If a unit do not have the "can fortify" flag you can not order 
> it to "sleep" until further orders. 
Patch #3718 has an idea for solving this bit, and takes other elements from
here (the automatic application of bonuses), but not all the ideas here.

___

Reply to this item at:

  

___
  Message sent via/by Gna!
  http://gna.org/


___
Freeciv-dev mailing list
Freeciv-dev@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev

[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #21795] fortify action more even in concurrent mode

[Marko Lindqvist]

Follow-up Comment #1, bug #21795 (project freeciv):

 Calculate automatically the bonus to defend no matter if the 
 units was ordered to fortify or not, in a similar way that it
 is already done for units in cities or fortresses.

If I understand correctly, you want to revert to civ1 model, where fortifying
in the open is immediate action, not requiring the one turn to go from
FORTIFYING - FORTIFIED. Note that units in cities already are always
considered fortifIED, even if they have spent all their movement to reach the
city (and thus would do even the fortifYING only next turn).

That would make it easier to advance and fortify where you got.
Current model vs civ1:
turn 1: moved / moved (0 movement points left)
turn 2: fortifying / fortified
turn 3: fortified / fortified


___

Reply to this item at:

  http://gna.org/bugs/?21795

___
  Message sent via/by Gna!
  http://gna.org/


___
Freeciv-dev mailing list
Freeciv-dev@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev

[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #21795] fortify action more even in concurrent mode

[David Fernandez]

Follow-up Comment #2, bug #21795 (project freeciv):

I admit I did not take into account this difference between civ1 and current
freeciv when I wrote it, but my idea was to calculate automatically if the
unit is fortified or not, not linked to the fortify action, but to the
movement points of the unit, so the setting unitwaittime can be taken into
account.

I'd rewrite it for freeciv current behavior:
- when the unit is going to recover the movement points (after the
unitwaittime of this turn), if the unit had remaining movement points from
previous turn, then the unit is automatically considered fortified (and the
fortified icon is drawn), until it moves again.

But I admit I like the civ1 alternative and it would be great to be able to
choose between them.

___

Reply to this item at:

  http://gna.org/bugs/?21795

___
  Mensaje enviado vía/por Gna!
  http://gna.org/


___
Freeciv-dev mailing list
Freeciv-dev@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev

[Freeciv-Dev] [bug #21795] fortify action more even in concurrent mode

[David Fernandez]

URL:
  http://gna.org/bugs/?21795

 Summary: fortify action more even in concurrent mode
 Project: Freeciv
Submitted by: bardo
Submitted on: vie 14 mar 2014 21:41:34 UTC
Category: None
Severity: 3 - Normal
Priority: 5 - Normal
  Status: None
 Assigned to: None
Originator Email: 
 Open/Closed: Open
 Release: 
 Discussion Lock: Any
Operating System: None
 Planned Release: 

___

Details:

The issues that could be improved:
- In single player, you can set a unit to fortify at the end of the turn and
it will appear fortified at the start of next turn, without risk of being
atacked in between.
The AI can't do the same because it always move at start of the turn.
- Something similar happens in multiplayer. If you delay your movements to the
end of the turn, there are less chances to be attacked until the units are
fortified at start of next turn.

- If a unit do not have the can fortify flag you can not order it to sleep
until further orders. The alternative is to use s order, but then the unit
is waken up by nearly enemies.

My suggestion:
- Calculate automatically the bonus to defend no matter if the units was
ordered to fortify or not, in a similar way that it is already done for units
in cities or fortresses.
- If a unit is attacked and it has some remaining movement point, and the unit
type has the can fortify flag, the unit automatically gets the +50% defend
bonus.
- Allow to every unit to use the fortify order as an alternative to
sentry, no matter if they can get defend bonuses or not.

This way, if a unit is ordered to fortify, it will always get the defend bonus
because it always has remaining movement points, not because it was ordered to
fortify.
It would work in a simar way than healing, you do not need to order the unit
to heal, it is automatically handle if the unit did not move.

At same time, if a unit runs out of movement points, it won't get the defend
bonus until the unit recovers his movement points next turn, but taking into
account the unitwaittime, and so making it more even for multiplayer games.




___

Reply to this item at:

  http://gna.org/bugs/?21795

___
  Mensaje enviado vía/por Gna!
  http://gna.org/


___
Freeciv-dev mailing list
Freeciv-dev@gna.org
https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/freeciv-dev