Hi, I collected some potentially interesting but kind-of-unreadable
notes (200+ lines) about Windows and FreeDOS. Might be interesting
to read for those who want to use Win3.x in FreeDOS or who want to
improve compatibility in this area. I made the notes for myself, but
hey, they are English ASCII
Hi!
8-Июл-2004 11:54 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Devore) wrote to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
MD> present. Full MS-DOS compatibility camp says the A000->A001 changing code
MD> should not be there. Non-crashing standard FreeDOS kernel camp says maybe
MD> it's needed.
_Bugfixed_ kernel allows this. T
Hi!
8-Июл-2004 22:45 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (tom ehlert) wrote to Michael Devore
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
te> WITHOUT PROGRAMMING OR TESTING !!
te> old kernel, NEW a000 EMM386:
te>1 - 9 available to programs
te>9 - a possibly used as UMB link, but not available
te>a -
Hi!
8-Июл-2004 13:10 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Erwin Veermans) wrote to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
EV> and improvements made, but I encountered a problem related
EV> with or revealed by Bart's MEM.EXE. When booting with latest
EV> kernel (2035 or Arkady's) plus Himem.exe plus Emm386
EV> and using xmsswap-comman
Hi!
8-Июл-2004 12:58 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alain) wrote to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
A> If you want a vote, the question that comes to my mind is: HOW CAN WE
A> TEST IT?
Just boot with "DEVICE=EMM386.EXE I=A000-B000".
A> I personaly will not use it, and don't know of any situation where this
A> coul
Hi Michael,
> Basic question of confusion here: Since FreeDOS is GPL'ed, and since
> action was taken in the past against a vendor who distributed FreeDOS with
> their commercial product without that commercial product being GPL, and
> since SpinRite is not GPL or Open Source, how the heck wo
At 02:02 PM 7/9/2004 +0200, Eric Auer wrote:
One poster said that he would be surprised that no FreeDOS people
jumped the opportunity to help SpinRite, either for increased popularity
and fame of FreeDOS itself or to get something back from GRC personally.
Simple answer: GRC never asked the FreeDOS
Hi Bernd, you are right:
> Subject: [Freedos-kernel] USB: USBASPI aqnd DI1000DD
> Date: Thu, 13 May 2004 20:18:59 +0200
Tom first suggested a statically allocated 512 byte low DOS RAM temp_buff
to make DI1000DD work. Then Bart and Tom got another idea:
> No. however AFAICS deblock_buf is only i
Eric Auer schreef:
He also writes about having fixed the di1000dd problem - which patch was that,
by the way? Nice to know :-).
Tom's message at 13-5-2004 20:18h (GMT+1, Wintertime?)
anyway, this started a discussion with Bart, and I believe the fix is
either in 2035 or in CVS.
Bart made anoth
Hi, I read the thread at:
http://news.grc.com/news.exe?cmd=xover&group=grc.spinrite.dev&utag=
... some summary points: SpinRite wants to reduce support costs by
switching to a more compatible OS, but MS-DOS is not an option. So
they could get PTS-DOS 32 (est. 6000 bucks/year in SpinRite case)
or
Hello Alain,
> I believe this is a very typical representation of FreeDOS development.
> Some people are optimizing it while critical problems (for some people)
> remain unsolved.
I don't think that this statement is valid for the last 3 years of
kernel development.
tom
-
Hello Eric,
> Thanks to Tom for 1. reporting the bug and 2. being quite unhelpful and
> insulting when I asked for possible reasons
well - heres eric's mail and my reply:
eric > Hi Tom, what makes you think that SORT is limited to 15k file size?
tom > download and testing it
Eric > I d
12 matches
Mail list logo
