On Wed, 20 Jul 2005, Alain wrote:
Just tested. I loaded DOSLFN from Jason Hood which is dated 7-jul-2004 under
DOSEMU 1.3.1
you may want to try 1.3.2 instead of 1.3.1
- the /LFN option did detect that LFN are available and show the name on the
right side, but is is *short* name :((
- NDN do
On Wed, 20 Jul 2005 23:46:53 -0300, you wrote:
Hi Alain,
>- the /LFN option did detect that LFN are available and show the name on
>the right side, but is is *short* name :((
>- NDN doesn't show any visible difference
LFN only works on CD-ROM for me.
If not the Kernel really supporting LFN, sti
Johnson Lam escreveu:
Lot of tests await :)
Just tested. I loaded DOSLFN from Jason Hood which is dated 7-jul-2004
under DOSEMU 1.3.1
- the /LFN option did detect that LFN are available and show the name on
the right side, but is is *short* name :((
- NDN doesn't show any visible differenc
On Wed, 20 Jul 2005 22:06:37 -0300, you wrote:
Hi,
>First of all, thanks to lots of people for the new FreeCOM Version :)
Lot of tests await :)
>The problem is that I want to remove a previous version of Window$ from
>the machine, but the *flash* files (and some others) are nested many
>direc
Hi, DOSEmu just has built-in LFNs for redirector drives.
I only use redirected drives (my C: is ~/dosemu/freedos), but LFN does
not seam to be active.
If
you use diskimage drives or real drives, you have to help
DOS by loading the DOSLFN resident tool, though. I think that
is all you have
Hi:
Kenneth J. Davis {KJD}
{Erwin Veermans}
{Bernd Blaauw}
{Eric Auer}
{Tom Ehlert}
[Eduardo Casino]
{Roberto Mariottini}
{Arkady V.Belousov}
and all anonimous...
Thanks for your contributions to the new FreeCOM
Alain
---
SF.Net email is spo
Hi all,
I am very interested in LFN for FreeDOS, specialy for use in DOSEMU. I
made a few tries without success. Dos it work? Which one? How?
If anyone is using it, please help
Alain
---
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Mig
First of all, thanks to lots of people for the new FreeCOM Version :)
I found a problem that I vagely remember reading about in this list: Is
there a limitation do 64 characters in the path length?
Would it be in the Kernel or in FreeCOM?
The problem is that I want to remove a previous versio
Kenneth J. Davis schreef:
Please test, assuming no major issues pop up in the next few days, this
weekend I will be making a new official FreeCom release.
* I would like to get my hands on critstrs.exe to test my DUTCH.ERR
translation
* Text files might be outdated, I'll test tomorrow (fixstr
> Hi, now that DOSLFN has grown far better than the outdated LFNDOS,
*now* ? did I miss something ?
> does everybody agree to remove LFNDOS from the official FreeDOS
> software list (LSM database)?
no.
actually the *whole* LSM database sucks anyway (in case of LFNDOS,
it's completely outdated, a
Hi, now that DOSLFN has grown far better than the outdated LFNDOS,
does everybody agree to remove LFNDOS from the official FreeDOS
software list (LSM database)? I am asking because there was once
a project to link LFNDOS to some kernel hooks, allowing a quite
performant LFN support, but now that
I found the licence agreement with the free Turbo C's in borland's
museum to be confusing. Has anyone asked Borland what exacly the rules
are the way was done with Pacific C? All I gathered was it is only for
"personal use" Does that preclude using it for FreeDOS?
--
Please test, assuming no major issues pop up in the next few days, this
weekend I will be making a new official FreeCom release.
For those with a 186 or better please use
http://www.fdos.org/kernel/cmdxms.HEAD.zip (English only)
http://www.fdos.org/kernel/cmdxms.HEAD.NLS.zip (other langu
13 matches
Mail list logo
