On Thu, 29 Jun 2006, Blair Campbell wrote:
I'm preparing FreeDOS 1.0-pre1 as we speak.
Excellent. /BURNS
-uso.
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere
Michael Devore wrote:
No, I'm sorry, this explanation doesn't quite do it to me. You are the
sole owner of the FreeDOS name. You can declare version 1.0, or 2.0.5 or
3.gizmo.woofdaddy at any time -- 1.0 release status doesn't and never did
need a committee. Just do it, give everybody on
And here I was just putting in my 5 cents:
First let me state that I am very sorry that I have been unable to fully do my
work for the FreeDOS project.
After Aitor posted the 1.0 TODO list it kind of took out the fun of this
project.
When I started working on the project in 1999 there wasn't
I think that 1.0 pre1 is good to start with, as we want to be able to
work out distribution bugs before a final release (we don't want to
repeat SR2).
--
Fall is my favorite season in Los Angeles, watching the birds change
color and fall from the trees.
David Letterman (1947 - )
See ya
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello all
And don't forget, that even the big companies like Dell and HP are
selling their computer with FreeDOS if you like it instead of Windows ;-)
Andreas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with
Blair Campbell wrote:
I think that 1.0 pre1 is good to start with, as we want to be able to
work out distribution bugs before a final release (we don't want to
repeat SR2).
I'd rather we went for 1.0 instead of 1.0 pre1. I agree we should
verify the distribution, but I'd rather we not
Well according my projects then.
The bugs in defrag are posted by me and can be discarded:
Defrag is never going to have FAT32 support. This is just not possible in such
a small amount of RAM.
If anybody remembers what's up with the interface, you can remind me now. As
far as I can say it
There is an alternative that is both easy and already working: dosfsck.
I have been using it and it apears to be working. (is is in djgpp) The
pnly prople is that there was some fixes to the working release that I
don't remember who did and where they are.
All that is needed is to all that
dosfsck doesn't do defragging, sorry. dosfsck is an alternative to
_chkdsk_ :-).
On 6/30/06, Alain M. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is an alternative that is both easy and already working: dosfsck.
I have been using it and it apears to be working. (is is in djgpp) The
pnly prople is that
And check eric's auersoft page somewhere for the dosfsck updates :-).
--
Fall is my favorite season in Los Angeles, watching the birds change
color and fall from the trees.
David Letterman (1947 - )
See ya
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff
Hello All,
I'd like to announce the availability of NLSFUNC version 0.3. It now uses
generic IOCTL calls for changing device codepages, so it should be ready for
FreeDOS 1.0. This version also works with current versions of DISPLAY (uses its
int 2f interface if DISPLAY reports version 1.0)
Eric Auer escreveu:
that's a very vague report... did you find any bugs
in the dos port of dosfsck 2.11? and how is this
related to defragmenting drives? dosfsck checks drives,
like scandisk, it does not defragment them...
Blair Campbell escreveu:
And check eric's auersoft page somewhere
I suggest moving to OpenWatcom, it is much closer to BorlandC. I have
many programs for both BC 16bits / OW 32bits and I can help with the port...
Alain
Blair Campbell escreveu:
Maybe a FAT32-enabled DEFRAG could use DJGPP to satisfy the memory
requirements?
Using Tomcat but need to do
I should have warned that it needs latest development kernel (1.1.37w) to work.
-Mensaje original-
De: Eduardo Casino [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Para: freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Enviado: 30/06/06 23:45
Asunto: [Freedos-devel] Announce: Nlsfunc 0.3
Hello All,
I'd like to announce the
Eric Auer escreveu:
Hi Alain, Blair,
of course I had already mailed Alain off-list to tell
him about his misunderstanding. And I HAD been thinking
about whether I should CC you to tell you that I have
already told him. Oh well. 2 more one-liner mails on
the list which were only interesting
15 matches
Mail list logo
