Blair Campbell wrote: > I think that 1.0 pre1 is good to start with, as we want to be able to > work out distribution bugs before a final release (we don't want to > repeat SR2). >
I'd rather we went for "1.0" instead of "1.0 pre1". I agree we should verify the distribution, but I'd rather we not officially announce "1.0 pre1". We can make something of a "1.0 pre1" available somewhere, and announce ON THIS LIST that it's available for us to TEST, but not mention "1.0 pre1" on the web site. The web site is our public face - as I have been painfully reminded. :-) I think we should still have a "1.0" in the best shape we can make it by 28 July. That's a month away ... I think we can do it. -jh -- I'm sorry my president's an idiot. I didn't vote for him. Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Freedos-devel mailing list Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel
