Michael Devore wrote:
> No, I'm sorry, this explanation doesn't quite do it to me.  You are the 
> sole owner of the FreeDOS name.  You can declare version 1.0, or 2.0.5 or 
> 3.gizmo.woofdaddy at any time -- 1.0 release status doesn't and never did 
> need a committee.  Just do it, give everybody on development a month's 
> notice and roll out what's there.  FreeDOS certainly works good enough for 
> 1.0 release.  In fact, I think it's worked well enough for a 
> while.  "Bugfree" won't ever happen.
> [...]
> Up to you.
>   

Well put.  I'm stepping up to the plate then.  Blair reported that he's 
working on "FreeDOS 1.0-pre1".  Let's not make that a "pre-release" - 
let's actually release it as "1.0".  To be released 28 July 2006.  
Whatever isn't ready by then waits for the "post 1.0" distro.


Everyone: for the good of the community, PLEASE let this be the last 
email in the "Horrible joke" thread.  The thread needs to die.  Let's 
finally stop the wheel-spinning and make our "1.0" debut.

-jh

-- 
I'm sorry my president's an idiot. I didn't vote for him.


Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier
Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Freedos-devel mailing list
Freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/freedos-devel

Reply via email to