Hi all,
uploaded to http://www.freedos.org/mem/ you can now
find mem111.zip :-)... Unfortunately I lost parts of
the mem 1.10 sources in the course of creating 1.11,
so if you still have a copy, we could upload that
to freedos.org again. I have recreated the lost part
based on 1.9a3, hopefully
* converted spaces to tabs in the sources, but not inside strings...
and made all diffs to previous versions useless :(((
Tom
-
Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security?
Get stuff
Hi Tom,
as you asked on the list, I will reply on the list as well:
snip
patch --help
Usage: patch [OPTION]... [ORIGFILE [PATCHFILE]]
Input options:
-p NUM --strip=NUM Strip NUM leading components from file names.
-F LINES --fuzz LINES Set the fuzz factor to LINES for
* converted spaces to tabs in the sources, but not inside
strings...
and made all diffs to previous versions useless :(((
Another point which is indeed bad style is that I have split
mem.c into mem.c and mem2.c - you can merge them again with very
little editing, but it would have
Eric Auer wrote:
Hi all,
uploaded to http://www.freedos.org/mem/ you can now
find mem111.zip :-)... Unfortunately I lost parts of
the mem 1.10 sources in the course of creating 1.11,
so if you still have a copy, we could upload that
to freedos.org again. I have recreated the lost part
Eric Auer wrote:
Another point which is indeed bad style is that I have split
mem.c into mem.c and mem2.c - you can merge them again with very
little editing, but it would have been a lot better to split the
file properly / cleanly. For now, mem.c simply ends with a line
#include mem2.c, and
Jim Hall wrote:
Eric Auer wrote:
Hi all,
uploaded to http://www.freedos.org/mem/ you can now
find mem111.zip :-)... Unfortunately I lost parts of
the mem 1.10 sources in the course of creating 1.11,
so if you still have a copy, we could upload that
to freedos.org again. I have
Hi all,
Blair pointed me to the fact that source packages
are not supposed to contain docs, according to our
specs. I object that recommendation. In my opinion,
source packages should contain everything outside
the bin directory, and binary packages should
contain everything outside the source
I think you are referring to this mini-HOWTO:
http://fd-doc.sourceforge.net/wiki/index.php?n=FdDocEn.Distribution
Yes, I agree that the source package should contain everything short of
the generated binaries. If there are dupe files, let them be
overwritten. This mini-HOWTO needs to be
Hi!
27-Авг-2006 13:11 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jim Hall) wrote to
freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net:
JH Oops, looks like I didn't mirror the correct version of mem110.zip.
JH On 26 Aug (yesterday) Eric re-released mem110.zip with an INT15
JH detection patch from a user. So the mem110.zip I have on
Two small notes:
(1) The HELP file (for FASTHELP) is probably NOT required in the
source package either
(2) There are docs that are very specific to sources (e.g. how to
build and such), that I myself usually don't pack under DOC, but under
SRC\DOC, so that they are only installed with sources (I
I agree with Aitor.
On 8/27/06, Aitor Santamaría [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Two small notes:
(1) The HELP file (for FASTHELP) is probably NOT required in the
source package either
(2) There are docs that are very specific to sources (e.g. how to
build and such), that I myself usually don't
PS: Jim, I don't know if you read my message from private mail: I was
just trying to ask you if you could allow or invite me to write to
you private messages from this account of mine (gmail). I say this as
I know your university seemed to have an ellaborate way of granting
access to you ;-)
I do have latest (second) edition of mem110.zip with conversion LF to
CRLF (latest file marked 2006/08/25). If you wish, I may resend it to you.
Email it to me off-list. I'll reply to you (off-list) with my work
(UofM) email address to use. My freedos.org account may fill up if you
Hi!
27-Авг-2006 17:53 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jim Hall) wrote to
freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net:
I do have latest (second) edition of mem110.zip with conversion LF to
CRLF (latest file marked 2006/08/25). If you wish, I may resend it to you.
JH Email it to me off-list. I'll reply to you
Hi!
27-???-2006 23:50 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eric Auer) wrote to
freedos-devel@lists.sourceforge.net:
EA Blair pointed me to the fact that source packages
EA are not supposed to contain docs, according to our
EA specs. I object that recommendation. In my opinion,
EA source packages should contain
Hi!
Let me disagree. Source package should contain only sources and other
files, which not need for program' user (not developer). Binary package
shouldn't contain these files. For example, doc/emm386/build.txt should be
present only in sources package, but it not need in binary package.
Hi,
2006/8/28, Eric Auer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
To bring this in context of our installer: The sources
included CDROM could just contain ONE set of FULL packages
and selectively skip files in source/ directories at the
moment when the packages are unzipped. That would also allow
full 8 char file
Just another one: perhaps we should think and standarize the HELP
(HTML-Help) directories, so that we distribute the HTM with the
packages itself, as opposed to submit them to the HTML-Help
maintainer, and hope that both programs (mine and HTML-Help) will be
distributed together with the sync-ed
I very much like the current spec and would wish to stick to it. I'm
not going to go about changing the packaging scheme (especially for
the distros).
On 8/27/06, Lyrical Nanoha [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 28 Aug 2006, Arkady V.Belousov wrote:
Documentation is need for program using
20 matches
Mail list logo
