Hi Imre,
> Eric told me you where working on something similar as me,
> namely a portable FAT file system.
that's right :-)
> I am not aware of what your intentions are with this port,
> so I am not going to try to steel this from you.
>
> But have you considered:
> - that FreeDOS doesn't ha
Hi Tom, thanks for the hints!
> TURBO C/FAT32:
> you mentioned 'linker complains: TGROUP exceeds 64KB' somewhere.
>
> TGROUP is *all* code called near and is a fundamental limit of small
> memory modell. If that's the problem, you got a real problem, as the
> kernels memory model is a bit complic
Tom Ehlert schreef:
>> 6PS Bernd: Could you try to get in touch with some of the old
>> experts to find any who can help me by fixing the kernel /
>>
That's what mailinglists are, I dont think anyone completely abandons
reading here, even though it be through web archives
(though sourceforge'
> PS Bernd: Could you try to get in touch with some of the old
> experts to find any who can help me by fixing the kernel /
TURBO C/FAT32:
you mentioned 'linker complains: TGROUP exceeds 64KB' somewhere.
TGROUP is *all* code called near and is a fundamental limit of small
memory modell. If that'
> Same as with the kernel, could an OpenWatcom expert please give
> me a hint how to say "farmalloc" (or fmalloc?) in a tiny memory
> model compiled OpenWatcom app? This is all that would be needed
> to compile SYS 3.3 in OpenWatcom :-). The sources are in Bugzilla:
I'm not an OW expert, but _fmal
Hi Bernd,
> As Eric Auer released a "bugzilla SYS 3.3" which starts confusing as
> unofficial 3.x versions already exist,
I agree that the "unstable kernel" SYS (which is also in the
subversion system, but in a separate branch) should have a
version number which is distinguishable from the "stab
> Florian Xaver schreef:
>> And there is another sys for Enhanced Dr-DOS from Udo Kuhnt at
>> http://www.drdosprojects.de
> Most likely the same SYS as I linked under '3.x' with support for
> various DOS bootsectors. (unless the DRDOS version has been further
> developed)
I don't think so.
Bye
Florian Xaver schreef:
> And there is another sys for Enhanced Dr-DOS from Udo Kuhnt at
> http://www.drdosprojects.de
>
Most likely the same SYS as I linked under '3.x' with support for
various DOS bootsectors. (unless the DRDOS version has been further
developed)
Bernd
--
> * SYS 3.2 (official FreeDOS)
> * SYS 3.3 (Bugzilla, Eric Auer, cant be compiled by Openwatcom)
> * SYS 3.x (Jeremy Davis and/or Blair Campbell, used for DRDOS, supports
> opensource bootsectors for various DOS flavours except
>MSDOS7.10/FAT32. This SYS is actually on the FREEDOS\SETUP\BIN
> s
As Eric Auer released a "bugzilla SYS 3.3" which starts confusing as
unofficial 3.x versions already exist,
is it possible to get everything unified in the Subversion concurrent
versioning system?
To my knowledge we got:
* Kernel 2036 (stable, all compilers)
* Kernel 2037 (unstable/experimental,
10 matches
Mail list logo
