[Freedos-devel] FAT patents and freedos?

2006-01-11 Thread Markus Laire
Slashdot has an article Microsoft FAT Patent Upheld http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/01/11/0555252tid=155tid=109 The discussion also links to the page FAT File System Technology License http://www.microsoft.com/mscorp/ip/tech/fat.asp Does anyone know if this is a problem for FreeDOS or

Re: [Freedos-devel] FAT patents and freedos?

2006-01-11 Thread Jim Hall
Markus Laire wrote: Slashdot has an article Microsoft FAT Patent Upheld http://yro.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/01/11/0555252tid=155tid=109 The discussion also links to the page FAT File System Technology License http://www.microsoft.com/mscorp/ip/tech/fat.asp Does anyone know if this is a

Re: [Freedos-devel] FAT patents and freedos?

2006-01-11 Thread Jim Hall
I started looking more into the patents in question, and I'm not really concerned with respect to FreeDOS. The 3 patents listed on http://www.microsoft.com/mscorp/ip/tech/fat.asp are: * U.S. Patent #5,579,517 Common name space for long and short filenames * U.S. Patent #5,758,352 Common

Re: [Freedos-devel] FAT patents and freedos?

2006-01-11 Thread Blair Campbell
If something ever were to come up to restrict FreeDOS support for FAT, it would always be possible to implement another filesystem, such as LeanFS or ext2. -- Fall is my favorite season in Los Angeles, watching the birds change color and fall from the trees. David Letterman (1947 - ) See ya