Alain wrote:
...
Ok, but and this remark that in in that page? Has it been fixed? It does
look strange because it is about build 2034 but tha page is dated 1
March, 2005.
FreeDOS has a problem with extended DPBs, which causes problems with
...
current kernels should be fine
Jeremy
Florian Xaver escreveu:
I like DOSLFN ( http://www.geocities.com/jadoxa/doslfn/index.html ) very
much. It is the only one, which works on my freedos system.
If you need help, contact me.
Ok, but and this remark that in in that page? Has it been fixed? It does
look strange because it is abou
On Thu, 21 Jul 2005 10:24:16 +0200, you wrote:
Hi Flo,
>I like DOSLFN ( http://www.geocities.com/jadoxa/doslfn/index.html ) very
>much. It is the only one, which works on my freedos system.
>If you need help, contact me.
Definitely need your help, can you write a few lines "LFN starter
guide" (
Hi Alain, hi all!
I like DOSLFN ( http://www.geocities.com/jadoxa/doslfn/index.html ) very
much. It is the only one, which works on my freedos system.
If you need help, contact me.
Bye, Flo
Alain wrote:
Hi all,
I am very interested in LFN for FreeDOS, specialy for use in DOSEMU. I
made a f
Hi all,
I am very interested in LFN for FreeDOS, specialy for use in DOSEMU. I
made a few tries without success. Dos it work? Which one? How?
If anyone is using it, please help
Alain
---
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Mig
> Hi, now that DOSLFN has grown far better than the outdated LFNDOS,
*now* ? did I miss something ?
> does everybody agree to remove LFNDOS from the official FreeDOS
> software list (LSM database)?
no.
actually the *whole* LSM database sucks anyway (in case of LFNDOS,
it's completely outdated, a
Hi, now that DOSLFN has grown far better than the outdated LFNDOS,
does everybody agree to remove LFNDOS from the official FreeDOS
software list (LSM database)? I am asking because there was once
a project to link LFNDOS to some kernel hooks, allowing a quite
performant LFN support, but now that
