Jim put it best, I think - remove the GUI's from the official media,
but leave them on ibiblio, which would be the FreeDOS equivalent of
the Hobbes archive for OS/2.
On Wed, 22 Feb 2023 at 23:53, Liam Proven wrote:
>
> On Sun, 19 Feb 2023 at 17:52, Jim Hall wrote:
> >
> > It's been a few days
On Wed, 22 Feb 2023, Liam Proven wrote:
On Sun, 19 Feb 2023 at 17:52, Jim Hall wrote:
It's been a few days since the last comment on this thread, so I think
those who have an opinion on this have voiced it.
Just seen it. I've moved house recently and have no broadband at my new place.
On Sun, 19 Feb 2023 at 17:52, Jim Hall wrote:
>
> It's been a few days since the last comment on this thread, so I think
> those who have an opinion on this have voiced it.
Just seen it. I've moved house recently and have no broadband at my new place.
> The consensus appears to be "Keep OpenGEM
> On Feb 19, 2023, at 12:50 PM, Jim Hall wrote:
>
> It's been a few days since the last comment on this thread, so I think
> those who have an opinion on this have voiced it.
>
> The consensus appears to be "Keep OpenGEM but drop oZone and SEAL" so
> let's remove oZone and SEAL in the next
It's been a few days since the last comment on this thread, so I think
those who have an opinion on this have voiced it.
The consensus appears to be "Keep OpenGEM but drop oZone and SEAL" so
let's remove oZone and SEAL in the next monthly test release. (These
will not be removed from Ibiblio, so
> And to be clear: I don't plan to delete these from the FreeDOS Files
> Archive at Ibiblio. My proposal is just to not include them in the
> next FreeDOS distribution.
+1
> If people want to keep using, say, SEAL -
> they can download it and install it themselves.
as of many other packages.
Danilo Pecher wrote:
> > Quite frankly, I would throw them all on the scrap heap.
Rugxulo wrote:
> I wouldn't quite "throw them away", but for simplicity we really don't
> have to include them. I don't use any GUI in DOS (by default).
>
> [off-topic comments dropped]
And to be clear: I don't
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 5:28 PM Danilo Pecher
wrote:
>
> Quite frankly, I would throw them all on the scrap heap.
I wouldn't quite "throw them away", but for simplicity we really don't
have to include them. I don't use any GUI in DOS (by default).
> As Jim said, none of them has any number
Quite frankly, I would throw them all on the scrap heap. As Jim said,
none of them has any number of apps worth noting and there is a reason
why no GUI other than Windows 3.11 ever took off under Dos. I know
that from painful experience of wasting two years on an attempt to
create one in the early
Hi Jim,
> On Feb 15, 2023, at 5:05 PM, Jim Hall wrote:
>
> As I mentioned in my other email, I don't think we need to have
> Graphical Desktops included in FreeDOS. I propose that we remove
> Graphical Desktops from the next FreeDOS, starting with the next
> FreeDOS Test release.
>
> Graphical
On 2/15/2023 2:05 PM, Jim Hall wrote:
As I mentioned in my other email, I don't think we need to have
Graphical Desktops included in FreeDOS. I propose that we remove
Graphical Desktops from the next FreeDOS, starting with the next
FreeDOS Test release.
Graphical Desktops were a neat
Hi Louis,
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 2:07 PM Jim Hall wrote:
> >
> > As I mentioned in my other email, I don't think we need to have
> > Graphical Desktops included in FreeDOS. I propose that we remove
> > Graphical Desktops from the next FreeDOS, starting with the next
> > FreeDOS Test release.
I would suggest that OpenGEM get moved to Extras.
On Wed, Feb 15, 2023 at 2:07 PM Jim Hall wrote:
>
> As I mentioned in my other email, I don't think we need to have
> Graphical Desktops included in FreeDOS. I propose that we remove
> Graphical Desktops from the next FreeDOS, starting with the
13 matches
Mail list logo
