Hi guys,
BTW, Unzip hasn't had a proper release since 2009 (AFAIK).
No, it hasn't.
I was halfway implying that FreeDOS wasn't necessarily incompetent
here, that it just hasn't changed much upstream since then. Hence
there's really nothing "new" to ship.
I know, there really is nothing we
Hi,
On Tue, Jan 10, 2017 at 4:58 AM, Joe Forster/STA wrote:
>
>> BTW, Unzip hasn't had a proper release since 2009 (AFAIK).
>
> No, it hasn't.
I was halfway implying that FreeDOS wasn't necessarily incompetent
here, that it just hasn't changed much upstream since then. Hence
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 4:15 PM, Eric Auer wrote:
>
> The 16 bit unzip is probably quite limited in performance
> and the range of files which it can unzip, but that is only
> a guess...
BTW, Unzip hasn't had a proper release since 2009 (AFAIK).
So, if you're desperate
Hi sparky4,
> this is most annoying i cannot do my usual file transfer with the
> freedos 1.2 unzip! gah!! why!?
The 16 bit unzip is probably quite limited in performance
and the range of files which it can unzip, but that is only
a guess... I do wonder how you installed FreeDOS 1.2 on a
this is most annoying i cannot do my usual file transfer with the
freedos 1.2 unzip! gah!! why!?
--
View this message in context:
http://freedos.10956.n7.nabble.com/Why-unzip-now-requires-a-386-tp25809.html
Sent from the FreeDOS - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.