On Sat, 04 Nov 2017 00:17:18 +, Dimitris Zilaskos wrote:
> Jack's drivers are required on a number of dos-era systems else FreeDOS
> will not even install/boot.
If it won't install nor boot, then how would you use any drivers in the
first place?
Any bug reports?
> Being unable to use
Hi,
Jack's drivers are required on a number of dos-era systems else FreeDOS
will not even install/boot. Being unable to use FreeDOS is annoying but a
working system is needed and the wishes of the owners of the respective
intellectual property have to be respected.
Cheers,
Dimitris
On Fri, Nov
On 11/3/2017 7:19 AM, Tom Ehlert wrote:
>
> just as a tiny side note:
>
> I am only aware of 2 persons THAT CONSISTENTLY SHOUT.
> Jack and the american president.
>
+1 :-P
Ralf
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
> Also, did you know that UMBPCI is actively maintained
> and more reliable in finding out which areas can be
> used for UMB etc. than JEMM / JEMM386? So it can be
> a good idea to use explicit EMM options based on what
> UMBPCI detected: This avoids more conflicts than the
> easier method of
Dear Eric,
> Hi :-) Quick news from Jack's drivers: He has a closed
> source update for XMGR (more fail-safe 386 XMS move)
> and UHDD: The new UHDD has the interesting feature of
> read-ahead for cache sizes of at least 20 MB. It is
> a simplified version without I/O overlap and DOS RAM
> search
On Fri, 03 Nov 2017 12:23:55 +0100, Eric Auer wrote:
>>> Quick news from /dev/null 's drivers: [etc. rant etc.]
>
> In short, you said "nag nag nag" ;-)
While it's obviously true that Rugxulo have some ranting issues, I don't
see any reason to promote proprietary software on the FreeDOS list
Hi Rugxulo,
>> Quick news from /dev/null 's drivers: [etc. rant etc.]
In short, you said "nag nag nag" ;-)
The features might still be interesting to test. Nobody
suggested to include any closed source in any distro.
Eric
