Hi Norbert,
The network client isn't loaded high at all.
OK.
And if you use umbpci everything works fine on all machines in our network.
Yes, that's my experience too.
So, there must be some functionality in emm386 that is this different
compared to umbpci that some machines do not like.
About WASM: I have found it to be to a degree compatible with TASM; so
much so in fact that it can generally assemble the output of tcc -S in
Turbo C 2.01.
On 8/22/06, Gerry Hickman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Norbert,
The network client isn't loaded high at all.
OK.
And if you use
Hello Norbert,
But there are still some systems, where the machine completely stops
responding when initializing the network.
some network clients don't work if loaded into UMB memory; they also
don't work with MSDOS emm386
So, for your testing I applied for a fully functional test version
But there are still some systems, where the machine completely stops
responding when initializing the network.
some network clients don't work if loaded into UMB memory; they also
don't work with MSDOS emm386
The network client isn't loaded high at all.
And if you use umbpci everything works
Hello Norbert,
But there are still some systems, where the machine completely stops
responding when initializing the network.
some network clients don't work if loaded into UMB memory; they also
don't work with MSDOS emm386
The network client isn't loaded high at all.
And if you use umbpci
Hi all,
But there are still some systems, where the machine completely stops
responding when initializing the network.
some network clients don't work if loaded into UMB memory; they also
don't work with MSDOS emm386
The network client isn't loaded high at all.
And if you use umbpci
Norbert Remmel schrieb:
You should also be prepared to send/sponsor this network card to
Michael
I really would like to do but my boss would cut my head off if I would
do so as you surely can imagine ;-)
That's just another way to solve the problem :D
SCNR ;)
Best regards,
Andre
Hi!
21-Авг-2006 18:08 [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andre Tertling) wrote to
freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net:
You should also be prepared to send/sponsor this network card to
I really would like to do but my boss would cut my head off if I would
AT That's just another way to solve the problem :D
AT
You should also be prepared to send/sponsor this network card to
I really would like to do but my boss would cut my head off if I would
AT That's just another way to solve the problem :D
AT SCNR ;)
What is SCNR?
Don't know either.
But he is right... Cutting my head off would really
At 06:50 PM 8/21/2006 +0200, Norbert Remmel wrote:
You should also be prepared to send/sponsor this network card to
I really would like to do but my boss would cut my head off if I would
AT That's just another way to solve the problem :D
AT SCNR ;)
What is SCNR?
Don't know
At 09:37 AM 8/21/2006 +0200, Norbert Remmel wrote:
During testing I discovered a bug concerning STR-ALT-DEL usage.
When pressing these keys, freedos crashes with invalid opcode outputting
some memory addresses and registers.
As I remember this wasn't like this using earlier versions of
At 09:37 AM 8/21/2006 +0200, Norbert Remmel wrote:
During testing I discovered a bug concerning STR-ALT-DEL usage.
When pressing these keys, freedos crashes with invalid opcode outputting
some memory addresses and registers.
Eric made a change suggestion which seems to clear up the problem with
12 matches
Mail list logo
