Re: [Freedos-user] Fwd: Re: FDAPM slow turbo c 2.01 down

2014-06-24 Thread Zbigniew
2014-06-23 0:03 GMT+02:00, Rugxulo: So, just to be clear, this is the TC 2.01 IDE only? So non-IDE cmdline compilation (tcc + tlink) is normal speed? Actually you're right: while compiling from command line, there's no (noticeable) difference. Have you tried other TC versions, e.g. TC++

Re: [Freedos-user] Fwd: Re: FDAPM slow turbo c 2.01 down

2014-06-22 Thread Rugxulo
Hi, On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 9:08 AM, Eric Auer e.a...@jpberlin.de wrote: From Zbigniew, in reply to my off-list question: Hi! Short question, is this mail about FDAPM or is it about UIDE? Actually, I wrote it about UIDE, but... And does it help to use the ADV:REG option for FDAPM

[Freedos-user] Fwd: Re: FDAPM slow turbo c 2.01 down

2014-06-19 Thread Eric Auer
From Zbigniew, in reply to my off-list question: Hi! Short question, is this mail about FDAPM or is it about UIDE? Actually, I wrote it about UIDE, but... And does it help to use the ADV:REG option for FDAPM instead of the APMDOS option? ...but indeed: replacing APMDOS parameter with