Re: [Freedos-user] Re: Eric's new and shiny inofficial FreeDOS 1.0/2.0 TODO list ready

2004-07-20 Thread Aitor Santamaría Merino
Hi, Eric Auer escribió: Hi! Ranting on... Bad news. Eric, you say your list is not to replace the official, then why you do it? why, being over 70 bugs, do you waste your time (and mine) in creating such a list? I claim that my list actually saves me some time: I can annotate things there

[Freedos-user] Re: Eric's new and shiny inofficial FreeDOS 1.0/2.0 TODO list ready

2004-07-20 Thread Eric Auer
Hi! Ranting on... > Eric, you say your list is not to replace the official, then why you do > it? why, being over 70 bugs, do you waste your time (and mine) in > creating such a list? I claim that my list actually saves me some time: I can annotate things there, while doing so would often be m

Re: [Freedos-user] Re: Eric's new and shiny inofficial FreeDOS 1.0/2.0 TODO list ready

2004-07-20 Thread Bernd Blaauw
Eric Auer schreef: Hi Jim, Aitor, my local list is indeed NOT the list which I suggested to upload. (to fd-doc) I suggested uploading the most recent list which Aitor had sent in a ZIP to Bernd and me, alledgedly because it was meant for eventual publication. I'll test my FTP account at fdos.org

[Freedos-user] Re: Eric's new and shiny inofficial FreeDOS 1.0/2.0 TODO list ready

2004-07-20 Thread Eric Auer
Hi Jim, Aitor, my local list is indeed NOT the list which I suggested to upload. (to fd-doc) I suggested uploading the most recent list which Aitor had sent in a ZIP to Bernd and me, alledgedly because it was meant for eventual publication. My own list is not intended to replace the official list