On Fri, 28 Oct 2005 22:01:32 +0100, you wrote:
Hi Gerry,
I don't really understand the interest in this. Why would anyone want to
install it? I mean we all have CD-ROM and bootable memory sticks these
days. Why not just release a bunch of files and let people write their
own installers. It's
Johnson Lam schreef:
8086 with FAT32 simultaneous is not practical. Maybe someone still own
a 8086 PC but please consider support from 80386, because today's DOS
program or XMS is for 80386.
we're just mentioning that should run on 8086, and that they should
support fat32. Not that FAT32 on
Hello out there,
six days without a single message on this list... is there something
wrong with my email account or the list?
Best regards,
Andre
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc.
Get Certified Today * Register for a
BTW: when we can expect 1.0?
--- Original message ---
From: Bernd Blaauw [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: freedos-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Freedos-user] ping?
Date: Friday 28 October 2005 17:25
pong
Hello out there,
six days without a single message on this list
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schreef:
BTW: when we can expect 1.0?
End of next year. For what still needs to be done, please see
http://wiki.fdos.org/Main/Todo_1_0
Delaying 1.0 beyond next year would make no sense, the amount of DOS
users is limited.
Already FreeDOS is very stable and usable, yet
Hi Bernd,
and 1.0 Preview series should start in Januari 2006.
No point rushing it:)
If we only would have to consider the same goals as Microsoft's DOS
5.00, then we're at 99% currently.
Surely it's way ahead of any real-mode o/s Microsoft has ever written?
I'm already using it (with
Gerry Hickman schreef:
Surely it's way ahead of any real-mode o/s Microsoft has ever written?
I'm already using it (with the help of umbpci) to build production
servers with the latest hardware. MS-DOS 5 and 6 are unusable on these
boxes. MS-DOS FDISK isn't scriptable, and can't cope with huge
