From: Eric Auer
Hi Eduardo,
> 2017-02-03 Ralf Quint:
>> Well, that works only with VMware, but unfortunately not with
>> VirtualBox, AFAIK.
> Right.
As with drivers for other things, it would still be good to
include vmsmount for those who use vmware to run FreeDOS :-)
From: Ralf Quint
On 2/3/2017 12:59 AM, Eduardo Casino wrote:
> I started a VirtualBox version a couple of years ago, but I lost
> interest in it. Maybe one day...
Well, despite being "from Oracle" these, days, it is the best "freely
available" hypervisor out there. The
From: Ralf Quint
On 2/2/2017 10:17 AM, Eric Auer wrote:
> By the way, it would be nice to include VMSMOUNT which lets
> DOS mount VMWare shared directories as drives, similar to
> the magic "directory as a drive" function in DOSEMU. Both
> require no network drivers at all,
From: Ulrich Hansen
--===6012861226599600310==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="Apple-Mail=_D27D0CEF-402E-483B-8C06-876F4F5D24B5"
--Apple-Mail=_D27D0CEF-402E-483B-8C06-876F4F5D24B5
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: Eduardo Casino
2017-02-03 12:29 GMT+01:00 Eric Auer :
> That sounds interesting! How far did you get, what is needed?
Hi Eric,
The low level pci interface is there, as well as some initialisation
stuff and code taken from vmsmount. All the
From: Eduardo Casino
2017-02-03 1:16 GMT+01:00 Ralf Quint :
> Well, that works only with VMware, but unfortunately not with
> VirtualBox, AFAIK.
Right.
> Otherwise, that would be my preferred method, similar to how you can
> share data with the
From: Ralf Quint
On 2/2/2017 1:24 AM, Ulrich Hansen wrote:
> Hmm. YouAve got a point. The thing is: FTPSRV was for some years the
> fastest way of getting files in and out of the FreeDOS guest. So I
> considered it something most people would want, also in the anormalo
>
From: Ulrich Hansen
--===8066260093034722502==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="Apple-Mail=_C66AE06C-D551-4755-886A-D2A39B14C871"
--Apple-Mail=_C66AE06C-D551-4755-886A-D2A39B14C871
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
From: Ralf Quint
On 2/1/2017 9:21 AM, Ulrich Hansen wrote:
> I also had time to update my VirtualBox images of FreeDOS. So if
> anybody liked these images in the past: Here are the new ones: :-)
>
> https://www.lazybrowndog.net/freedos/virtualbox/
And to add to my last
From: Ralf Quint
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--===3004881457433939489==
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="D0A50F08F8D2FAE38F8C27C5"
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
2017-02-03 12:29 GMT+01:00 Eric Auer :
> That sounds interesting! How far did you get, what is needed?
Hi Eric,
The low level pci interface is there, as well as some initialisation
stuff and code taken from vmsmount. All the shared folders protocol is
missing, so there is
On 2/3/2017 12:59 AM, Eduardo Casino wrote:
> I started a VirtualBox version a couple of years ago, but I lost
> interest in it. Maybe one day...
Well, despite being "from Oracle" these, days, it is the best "freely
available" hypervisor out there. The VMware stuff is all for pay these
days, and
On 2/3/2017 5:02 AM, Ulrich Hansen wrote:
>
>>> 2017-02-03 Ralf Quint:
>>
Well, that works only with VMware, but unfortunately not with
VirtualBox, AFAIK.
>>
>>> Right.
>>
>> As with drivers for other things, it would still be good to
>> include vmsmount for those who use vmware to run
>> 2017-02-03 Ralf Quint:
>
>>> Well, that works only with VMware, but unfortunately not with
>>> VirtualBox, AFAIK.
>
>> Right.
>
> As with drivers for other things, it would still be good to
> include vmsmount for those who use vmware to run FreeDOS :-)
Vmware uses vmdk images, my
Hi Eduardo,
> 2017-02-03 Ralf Quint:
>> Well, that works only with VMware, but unfortunately not with
>> VirtualBox, AFAIK.
> Right.
As with drivers for other things, it would still be good to
include vmsmount for those who use vmware to run FreeDOS :-)
>> Otherwise, that would be my
2017-02-03 1:16 GMT+01:00 Ralf Quint :
> Well, that works only with VMware, but unfortunately not with
> VirtualBox, AFAIK.
Right.
> Otherwise, that would be my preferred method, similar to how you can
> share data with the host in DOSBox/VDOS...
I started a VirtualBox
Hi everybody,
I agree with Ralf - it is not intuitive that a non-network
operating system installs a network, even if it is only for
FTP file exchange. I think those who do want to use network
tools to communicate between host OS and a virtual PC with
FreeDOS inside will be able to deliberately
On 2/2/2017 1:24 AM, Ulrich Hansen wrote:
> Hmm. You’ve got a point. The thing is: FTPSRV was for some years the
> fastest way of getting files in and out of the FreeDOS guest. So I
> considered it something most people would want, also in the „normal“
> image without additional networking
> Am 02.02.2017 um 08:57 schrieb Ralf Quint :
> Well,...
>> Not Found
>>
Oh, sorry. I forgot to change one of the two links there. Thanks!! I repaired
it.
> On the side for the version supposedly without network, you are talking an
> awful lot about the networking stuff
On 2/1/2017 9:21 AM, Ulrich Hansen wrote:
> I also had time to update my VirtualBox images of FreeDOS. So if
> anybody liked these images in the past: Here are the new ones: :-)
>
> https://www.lazybrowndog.net/freedos/virtualbox/
And to add to my last email, the supposedly non-network image
On 2/1/2017 9:21 AM, Ulrich Hansen wrote:
I also had time to update my VirtualBox images of FreeDOS. So if
anybody liked these images in the past: Here are the new ones: :-)
https://www.lazybrowndog.net/freedos/virtualbox/
Well,...
On the side for the version supposedly without network, you
21 matches
Mail list logo