Hi Bruce,
i've download your package, but i've a problem.
I running Pupy linux lucid, so the package don't start (also if i use WINE).
I've download and extract files on root, then ,with my cd editor i've burned
the contents of folder Images with subfolder, but when i boot from cd
nothing
What I sent you is not a CD image. You have to build the image first using
mkBootableCD.bat, then burn the resulting file myCD.iso.
It seems unlikely that this will work on a Linux machine. If you can't find
a Windows machine then someone else will have to help you.
Sorry,
Bruce
On Wed, Jan 2,
The problem is that there's a limit to what one can ask to a FreeDOS tool:
if it breaks MS-DOS compatibility. If DATE/T is taken as an option by
MS-DOS COMMAND.COM, so should FreeCOM. You don't know how many batch
programs could stop working with that change.
Aitor
2012/4/11 Zbigniew
As far as I know, it is just for assembler, not C... (but nice all the
same!).
I did some experiments in the past with Nomyso till JWASM appeared
(motivated by the fact that older JEMM only compiled under MASM).
Aitor
2012/4/11 Bernd Blaauw bbla...@home.nl
Op 11-4-2012 20:25, Rugxulo schreef:
A yearly classic! :)
Well, I'm late, but by that time I'm sure that the question would
eventually arise again. I give my 2 c
I have been giving a thought about this for a while, and I think that part
of the problem is that is to be understood by DOS. I have two approaches
for the question:
* If
yawn Againfor 2013
/yôn/
Verb
Involuntarily open one's mouth wide and inhale deeply due to tiredness or
boredom.
Noun
A reflex act of opening one's mouth wide and inhaling deeply due to
tiredness or boredom.
.
FreeDOS has a great future. It does not have to depend on
On 01/03/2013 07:52 AM, Aitor Santamaría wrote:
...
Now I wonder myself if any of these two variants will dominate in the
future, or if there will be a third different approach to the future of DOS.
For those of us who use DOS for its simpleminded I do what I'm told and
that's all I do
On Wed, Jan 2, 2013 at 7:57 PM, Jim Lemon j...@bitwrit.com.au wrote:
If there was a Linux kernel in which the user could turn off everything that
isn't in DOS, that would be a way out.
If you could turn off everything that *isn't* in DOS, you might have
fun running the Linux kernel. You run
Hey Rugxulo!
Coincidentally I've been reading older posts of yours on other
threads/forums re memory management (DOS/32a) and your involvement with
the Stone Soup dungeon crawler, amongst other things - many thanks for
your encouragement, but this is not an experiment I will give up so
easily,
