Re: [Freedos-user] 32 bit FreeDOS?

2012-04-10 Thread dmccunney
On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 7:19 AM, Zbigniew wrote: > At the time of cheap computers, do we really need "multiuser" OS? It > was reasonable 20 years ago, when fast machine was really expensive - > but is it still today, when every average user can have his own > computer (and - in fact - has several

Re: [Freedos-user] 32 bit FreeDOS?

2012-04-09 Thread Robert Riebisch
Bernd Blaauw wrote: >> Actually, I wish someone would release a Windows 3.1 driver that can >> get my ATI Rage 128, XPERT 2000, card to output 256 colors. For that >> matter, how hard would it be to make a Windows like graphical user >> interface that can run Windows 3.1 software? > > There shou

Re: [Freedos-user] 32 bit FreeDOS?

2012-04-09 Thread Bernd Blaauw
Op 8-4-2012 8:17, Michael Robinson schreef: > Actually, I wish someone would release a Windows 3.1 driver that can > get my ATI Rage 128, XPERT 2000, card to output 256 colors. For that > matter, how hard would it be to make a Windows like graphical user > interface that can run Windows 3.1 softw

Re: [Freedos-user] 32 bit FreeDOS?

2012-04-08 Thread Eric Auer
Hi! > Actually, I wish someone would release a Windows 3.1 driver that can > get my ATI Rage 128, XPERT 2000, card to output 256 colors. For that Somebody may have tweaked existing SVGA drivers into generic VESA. I am not aware of anything 3d accelerated in Windows 3 anyways... > Linux gets a

Re: [Freedos-user] 32 bit FreeDOS?

2012-04-07 Thread Michael Robinson
Windows 3.11 and Windows 9x seem to be the closest thing to a 32 bit DOS environment that I know of. I agree that creating a "32 bit dos" would be awkward. Heck, 20 bit memory addressing is awkward, isn't it? If you need to run dos games or want to run a Wordprocessor like Wordperfect on an old

Re: [Freedos-user] 32 bit FreeDOS?

2012-04-07 Thread Rugxulo
Hi, On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Ralf A. Quint wrote: > At 11:39 AM 4/7/2012, Marco Achury wrote: >>Check Kolibri OS, is very nice 32 bits, simple, >>ligth, GUI, boot from floppy... >> >>The sole thing is missing there is a DOS >>emulator so we can run our beloved DOS >>apps. > > So what CAN y

Re: [Freedos-user] 32 bit FreeDOS?

2012-04-07 Thread Ralf A. Quint
At 11:39 AM 4/7/2012, Marco Achury wrote: >Check Kolibri OS, is very nice 32 bits, simple, >ligth, GUI, boot from floppy... > >The sole thing is missing there is a DOS >emulator so we can run our beloved DOS >apps. So what CAN you run on that, beside playing Minesweeper? Ralf -

Re: [Freedos-user] 32 bit FreeDOS?

2012-04-07 Thread Alex
On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 8:39 PM, Marco Achury wrote: > Check Kolibri OS, is very nice 32 bits, simple, > ligth, GUI, boot from floppy... > > The sole thing is missing there is a DOS > emulator so we can run our beloved DOS > apps. Kolibri OS has a DOS emulator: Dosbox. -

Re: [Freedos-user] 32 bit FreeDOS?

2012-04-07 Thread Marco Achury
El 07/04/2012 01:02 p.m., Ralf A. Quint escribió: > At 03:15 AM 4/7/2012, Alex wrote: >> In the recent threads there have been many mentions to the fact that >> FreeDOS is "only" 16bit (of course, that is what it is meant to be) >> and that it is out of touch with the modern computing world. Chec

Re: [Freedos-user] 32 bit FreeDOS?

2012-04-07 Thread Ralf A. Quint
At 04:19 AM 4/7/2012, Zbigniew wrote: > >> I was wondering what would it take to upgrade FreeDOS to 32bit, > >> whether it would be worth and whether we would have the human > >> resources. > > > > 32bit user programs tend to be available already in the form of > > protected mode software, using on

Re: [Freedos-user] 32 bit FreeDOS?

2012-04-07 Thread Ralf A. Quint
At 03:15 AM 4/7/2012, Alex wrote: >In the recent threads there have been many mentions to the fact that >FreeDOS is "only" 16bit (of course, that is what it is meant to be) >and that it is out of touch with the modern computing world. You do realize that it is kind of 'out of touch with the modern

Re: [Freedos-user] 32 bit FreeDOS?

2012-04-07 Thread Eric Auer
Hi! > FreeDOS is "only" 16bit Of course that only refers to address space (max 1.1 MB) and not to computation width. Your software can do any calculations with 32, 64, 80 or 128 bits that it likes, using 386+ registers or the FPU but not 64bit long mode. > I was wondering what would it take to

Re: [Freedos-user] 32 bit FreeDOS?

2012-04-07 Thread Zbigniew
2012/4/7, Bernd Blaauw : >> I was wondering what would it take to upgrade FreeDOS to 32bit, >> whether it would be worth and whether we would have the human >> resources. > > 32bit user programs tend to be available already in the form of > protected mode software, using one of the various DOS Ext

Re: [Freedos-user] 32 bit FreeDOS?

2012-04-07 Thread Bernd Blaauw
Op 7-4-2012 12:15, Alex schreef: > I was wondering what would it take to upgrade FreeDOS to 32bit, > whether it would be worth and whether we would have the human > resources. 32bit user programs tend to be available already in the form of protected mode software, using one of the various DOS Ex

[Freedos-user] 32 bit FreeDOS?

2012-04-07 Thread Alex
In the recent threads there have been many mentions to the fact that FreeDOS is "only" 16bit (of course, that is what it is meant to be) and that it is out of touch with the modern computing world. I was wondering what would it take to upgrade FreeDOS to 32bit, whether it would be worth and whethe