Thank you very much for your quick answers and your help.
I'm a really fan of DOS systems. For me is the best system (at least
the last system that I know what really is doing on the startup and
then I can configure it). From Windows 95 onwards all is a black
box...
I have the following DOS
Hi Chema,
I haven't could to take a look at 32 bits and preemptive multitask DOS
versions, because they are very expensive:
Another subject, what about DOS GUI? Seal is dead, also BreadBox
Ensemble GEOS, so nowadays there isn't any project to develop a modern
GUI for DOS. Windows 3.xx is
Gerry Hickman schreef:
There are some definite problems with the CD driver, you may want to
try VIDE-CDD.SYS
guess why we call ATAPICDD.SYS alpha..
In fact I don't know the state of any revision of it (binary is 0.2.10 I
think) and if it's simply a case of
NASM ATAPICDD.NSM or not for any
they use boot disks. FreeDOS is easy in that sense. But I tried to
install the FreeDOS 0.9 Beta Enhaced Disk and it gave me some
problems. Also the Atapi cd-rom driver included (the alpha version) is
very slow to load! Do you recommend me to install better the FreeDOS
0.9 Lite Version or the
Hi Blair,
My first problem was in the installation process. When I tried to see
the content of one package, right now I don't remember well the name,
it happened an error and a message error was printed on the screen in
text mode.
After installation process (one of the applications to install
Hi Bernd,
guess why we call ATAPICDD.SYS alpha..
UDMA drivers seem to stabilize the ATAPICDD driver (or IDE bus) a bit.
I didn't mean to imply we expect it to work perfectly at alpha stage. I
was just saying there are some definite problems. It's not just me, I
think the FreeDOS
