Luchezar Georgiev a Ãcrit :
Just thinking maybe can use FreeDOS to rescue NTFS, if too complex
then drop it.
The read-only version of NTFSDOS is free, but the read-write version
isn't :(
But the ntfs tools on
ftp://ftp.ibiblio.org/pub/micro/pc-stuff/freedos/files/util/disk/ntfs.zip
.Are they
Just thinking maybe can use FreeDOS to rescue NTFS, if too complex then
drop it.
The read-only version of NTFSDOS is free, but the read-write version isn't
:(
Is FreeDOS ready for LFN? I mean LFN will affect the FAT table, is
FreeDOS already spare enough 'space' for the extra space? And other d
On Sat, 28 Aug 2004 11:35:42 +0300, you wrote:
Hi Lucho,
>Why not put up a list of FreeDOS-incompatible software so that problems
>can be solved one-by-one? Can you ask your friend to make a list of his
>software not running under FreeDOS and a brief description of the problem
>with each piece
Johnson Lam schreef:
Yes, and PCI-X is coming out, oops ... target change again.
PCI-X (PCI eXtended) is a server version of pci.
PCI-E is PCI-Express, which is new :)
Bernd
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic Workshop
FREE Java
æ ä ç
I got a friend testing FreeDOS and he report lots of problem with his
old software.
Why not put up a list of FreeDOS-incompatible software so that problems
can be solved one-by-one? Can you ask your friend to make a list of his
software not running under FreeDOS and a brief description of
On Fri, 27 Aug 2004 21:02:33 +0300, you wrote:
Hi Lucho,
>;-) So we have only 16% left now ;-)
Maybe already 10% less ;-)
I got a friend testing FreeDOS and he report lots of problem with his
old software.
>I agree. It's not accident that the ROM-DOS kernel supports LFNs.
I notice some of the
So I think both of them reached a certain level of stability, say 84% of
M$-DOS
;-) So we have only 16% left now ;-)
We need a new Victor Vlasenko to integrate LFN support in the kernel.
IMHO, LFN is a high priority task because we can really replace some
Windows application by FreeDOS.
I agree.
