Back in the old DOS days, I used to use a very good file finding program
named WIZ.
I just received an email from its author, letting me know he fixed it to
work with Win XP, as well as a few other things. Here is his sstatement:
WIZ now completely supports Windows XP and Windows2000, including
l
No You! wrote:
Back in the old DOS days, I used to use a very good file finding program
named WIZ.
I just received an email from its author, letting me know he fixed it to
work with Win XP, as well as a few other things. Here is his sstatement:
WIZ now completely supports Windows XP and Windows200
Hi all,
I contacted Matt and he wrote that he is using a very old FreeDOS
which came with SuSE Linux 8.1 ... as far as I remember, even
SuSE Linux 9.0 had quite old DOSEMU and FreeDOS versions included.
Does somebody know about SuSE Linux 9.1? If not, we should probably
remind people at SuSE to do
Jim,
Here is a REAL OLD program (Turbo Pascal 4.0) that I wrote called "whereis". Any one
want to maintain it? Add copyright, pick an open source license, compile, etc.?
*Begin Source Next Line*
program WhereIs; {finds where files are located}
I already submitted a search utility back in April 2003, one I wrote in
1997. You can download it from my website at
http://www.geocities.com/xsaintx69/freedos It's called, "Search". Can you
guess what it does?
Later,
Joe
---
This SF.net e
This whole File Search Utility thread has gotten me thinking about DOS
programming. I program mainly in either Win32 C++ for apps or Perl for
scripts. However, I've played around with DOS C programming from time to
time, and would like some 'real-world exercises', so to speak.
So, is there a list
Hi Jay,
of course FreeDOS has a list of utilities which need tweaking!
You can go to www.freedos.org -> FreeDOS 1.0 TODO list,
or to www.freedos.org -> Bugzilla -> query -> select sort by assignee.
Chart of bugzilla entries:
23 kernel, 19 shell, 13 distro (installer etc.), 9 fdisk, 6 format, 5 c
> SCANDISK - this should be implemented as an user interface to DOSFSCK
Yes, for this you should strip down dosfsck (throw out delayed writing and
the undelete feature). Then you should make it compile with turbo c++ and
then with a litle bit of tweaking the rest of the code you should be able
to
Hi Imre!
> > SCANDISK - this should be implemented as an user interface to DOSFSCK
>
> Yes, for this you should strip down dosfsck (throw out delayed writing and
I disagree: Delayed writing is perfectly useful because you can use the code
to create an UNDO LOG before actually changing the disk,
