Hi Ray,
This is CHKDSK beta 0.9.1
If there is a sub-directory present on a floppy, CHKDSK report seems
normal. If there is no sub-directory - whether or not there are files:
Assertion failed: size, file bitfield.c, line 34
Abnormal program termination
Is this to be expected?
No. I
This is CHKDSK beta 0.9.1
If there is a sub-directory present on a floppy, CHKDSK report seems
normal. If there is no sub-directory - whether or not there are files:
Assertion failed: size, file bitfield.c, line 34
Abnormal program termination
Is this to be expected?
ChkDsk beta 0.9.2
Hi,
On Fri, May 13, 2011 at 3:34 AM, Marcos Favero Florence de Barros
fav...@mpcnet.com.br wrote:
This is CHKDSK beta 0.9.1
If there is a sub-directory present on a floppy, CHKDSK report seems
normal. If there is no sub-directory - whether or not there are files:
Assertion failed: size,
Hi Marcos, Jack,
Readme.Txt says Power-saving features such as a 'drive
spin-down timeout' should be DISABLED.
...
Is that what I should disable? If so, does this mean that
the hard disk must keep running all the time if UIDE is used?
Of course DOS will freeze for a short
Eric,
Of course DOS will freeze for a short moment when it has to
wait for a harddisk to spin up again, but as I never had a
bigger problem than that with power-saving in DOS without
UIDE, I would like to suggest the opposite of what the UIDE
readme.txt seems to say at the moment:
Could
I don't know whether the information below is of any value, but
I'm reporting it anyway, just in case.
I have been using UIDE for almost a year in one desktop and two
notebooks, blissfully unaware that hard disks are not supposed to
sleep.
All three computers were set to spin down their disks.
All this talk about UIDE prompted me to investigate this tool. It looks
interesting. How does the caching work for disk writes? I assume that when
the cache is full the next sector read in will cause the oldest sector to be
written out?
Is there any sort of a timer which will flush the cache
